To: Michael81Dus
it was killing with weapons of mass destruction which is defined as murder in our law. Well, all I can say to that is that I thank God everyday that our law and our society is different than yours in Germany and France. BTW, do you find it the slightest bit ironic that given your country's past history you deign to lecture Americans about mass-murder?
To: vbmoneyspender
I have no problems to criticize anybody. Keeping the lectures America told my nation after the war in mind, I´m just doing what Byrnes wanted us to do: expressing our opinion in a free society.
I was born in 1981. I am innocent, I never committed a crime. I take and use my right to say what I think.
But to make you sleeping well: when I wrote "difference between murder and murder" I thought of Holocaust and Pearl Harbour, not of Hiroshima (and hadn´t posted it then). After that I realized that Hiroshima was meant and I thought about it and came to the conclusion that the use of the nukes were wrong. At least in Nagasaki.
141 posted on
03/07/2003 2:49:33 PM PST by
Michael81Dus
(http://mitglied.lycos.de/p0wer/Download/time.swf)
To: vbmoneyspender
I heard a radio listener commenting about Germany's reluctance:
"The destruction and mayhem in Iraq won't be on the scale that Germany prefers, so they're opting out."
To: vbmoneyspender
"Well, all I can say to that is that I thank God everyday that our law and our society is different than yours in Germany and France. BTW, do you find it the slightest bit ironic that given your country's past history you deign to lecture Americans about mass-murder?"
Seems that America needs this lecture exactly...
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson