Skip to comments.
Fistgate to be Held
Again on March 15
MassNews ^
| March 7, 2003
| MassNews Staff
Posted on 03/07/2003 7:35:36 AM PST by scripter
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 321-329 next last
To: FourtySeven
161
posted on
03/11/2003 8:26:59 AM PST
by
EdReform
(Support Free Republic - www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/581234/posts?page=914#914)
Comment #162 Removed by Moderator
Comment #163 Removed by Moderator
Comment #164 Removed by Moderator
Comment #165 Removed by Moderator
To: madg
I think Ed and I both made our point.
No one should be teaching children about gay sex.
I think you made your point too.
You advocate it.
166
posted on
03/11/2003 6:23:51 PM PST
by
philetus
(Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get)
Comment #167 Removed by Moderator
To: madg
"So your teenager comes home from school and asks you "what is 'fisting?'"
Ya, like there are any teenagers left that don't know what fisting is.
How do I respond?"
I would tell him/her "it's where sick,perverted,weirdos, get their jollies, ramming their fists up each others rectums."
My kids would then say "ewww,gross" and go looking for one to beat up.
168
posted on
03/11/2003 8:07:52 PM PST
by
philetus
(Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get)
To: madg
"(Likewise, your apparently misinformed opinion of condoms is also irrelevent.)"
Not sure what his misconception was, madg, but I use this reference for HIV/condom effectiveness. The study was for male-female contact and did not get into gay sex in any detail:
"Among participants who reported always using condoms, the summary estimate of HIV/AIDS incidence from the twelve studies was 0.9 seroconversion per 100 person years. Among those who reported never using condoms, the summary estimate of HIV/AIDS incidence from the seven studies was 6.7 seroconversions per 100 person years. Overall, Davis and Weller estimated that condoms provided an 85% reduction in HIV/AIDS transmission risk when infection rates were compared in always versus never users."
http://www.niaid.nih.gov/dmid/stds/condomreport.pdf
This is the report CDC uses when asked about condom effectiveness. Assuming the same protection rate among gays, a 15% risk (the flip side of 85% effective) is pretty risky when your life is on the line. The more partners or the more contact with an infected partner and the risk goes up.
In Russian Roulette, having only one cylinder loaded is 5/6, or 83% effective in not getting shot, or 16% dangerous (1/6), depending.
When I read the NIAID study it made me rethink risks!
169
posted on
03/11/2003 8:21:47 PM PST
by
DBrow
Comment #170 Removed by Moderator
Comment #171 Removed by Moderator
To: madg
The "mandated assembly" I mentioned, was performed in a MA High School by Suzie Landolfi. She was promoting condoms as "safe sex". That IS a lie. The AIDS virus is able to easily penetrate flaws in the latex and the out and out failure rate of condoms is high. That is fact not "Misinformed opinion". Curious that the "Safe" Sex slogan was changed to "SAFER" shortly thereafter. The prospect of lawsuits looming on the horizon.
The SCREAMING I am doing is just that, and it started a long time ago when it became evident that the Sex EDUCATION curriculum being formulated for use in ALL public schools, was and now is,being used primarily as a vehicle for the homosexual agenda. To move public opinion from toleration of the life style to accepting it as NORMAL. To date, hundreds of thousands of young, innocent, impressionable minds have had this SHOVED at them, to use your expression.
Massachusets was in the vanguard of the Sex Ed curriculum and Falmouth held the distinction of being the first JUNIOR and Senior Highschools, in the NATION,to provide condoms for their students.
You are defending the right of 25 young minds to voluntarily attend this GLSEN workshop. I will continue to fight for the innocent who didn't volunteer and for their parents who don't know what is being TAUGHT in their public school classrooms and For parents who have given their children strong values and find that those values are challenged and are not acceptable in todays SAFE classrooms if they don't include the acceptance of homosexuality as NORMAL.
To: madg
The "mandated assembly" I mentioned, was performed by Suzie Landolfi. She was promoting condoms as "safe sex". That IS a lie.The AIDS virus is able to easily penetrate flaws in the latex and the out and out failure rate of condoms is high. That is fact not "Misinformed opinion". Curious that the "Safe" Sex slogan was changed to "SAFER" shortly thereafter. The prospect of lawsuits looming on the horizon.
The SCREAMING I am doing is just that, and it started a long time ago when it became evident that the Sex EDUCATION curriculum being formulated for use in ALL public schools, was and now is,being used primarily as a vehicle for the homosexual agenda. To move public opinion from toleration of the life style to accepting it as NORMAL. To date, hundreds of thousands of young, innocent, impressionable minds have had this SHOVED at them, to use your expression.
Massachusets was in the vanguard of the Sex Ed curriculum and Falmouth held the distinction of being the first JUNIOR High and Senior Highschools, in the NATION,to provide condoms for their students.
You are defending the right of 25 young minds to voluntarily attend this workshop. I will continue to fight for the innocent who didn't volunteer and for their parents who don't know what is being TAUGHT in the classroom. For parents who have given their children strong values and find that those values are not acceptable in todays SAFE classrooms if they don't include the acceptance of homosexuality as NORMAL.
To: madg
Your prospective answer is factually inaccurate. How? It involves one person inserting their fist into a body cavity of another person. When those two persons are male then that cavity must be the rectum. Seems that philetus' reply was 100% factually accurate. Only "sick,perverted,weirdos," would do such an unnatural thing.
174
posted on
03/12/2003 8:41:20 AM PST
by
John O
(God Save America (Please))
Comment #175 Removed by Moderator
To: madg; philetus
I believe the poster used the term "ramming." That is factually inaccurate. "Ram" according to webster's dictionary "(3) to stuff; cram (4) to force passage or acceptance of"
Seems that anything going in the out door will need to be crammed or forced through the passage.
philetus was 100% accurate. You owe him an apology
176
posted on
03/12/2003 11:08:47 AM PST
by
John O
(God Save America (Please))
Comment #177 Removed by Moderator
To: madg
but your terms are too violent. Its not ramming, cramming, stuffing, shoving
None of those words denote violence. They denote force. force is always required to push something where it doesn't naturally go.
You still owe philetus an apology
178
posted on
03/12/2003 11:29:09 AM PST
by
John O
(God Save America (Please))
To: John O; philetus; DBrow; codder too; EdReform
I see that you've all become acquainted with madg.
179
posted on
03/12/2003 2:32:25 PM PST
by
Bryan
To: madg
madg, you missed the part of the report where it said 85% effective. That was calculated out of the seroconversion data you misunderstood.
The condom is 85% effective in preventing HIV infection with male-female vaginal intercourse, that was the point.
Do you know of another report that has a different number for effectiveness?
180
posted on
03/12/2003 7:20:44 PM PST
by
DBrow
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 321-329 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson