Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TravisBickle
I too have been wondering if "consent" must necesarily be determined by a vote. If the current game plan does not meet with success (and I am still persuaded that it will in due course), then I think that President Bush should consider declaring that a written consent signed by 51+ senators is all the consent that he needs and let the Dems file a lawsuit to block Estrada from taking the bench. Or the administration and/or Estrada could file a suit for declaratory judgment to determine if the nomination has the necessary consent under the circumstances.

I would also like to see the Senate, after making a big public display of how broken the system is, amend the Senate rules to preclude a filibuster of judicial nominations or make other such changes that would prohibit the current stalemate. Then they could have an up-or-down vote on the nomination and seat Estrada. Let the Dems file suit or the Repubs seek a declaratory judgment.

I would not advise these steps if the nomination can be confirmed under any other circumstances.
43 posted on 03/07/2003 8:27:48 AM PST by Iwo Jima (Frist is one smart operator.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Iwo Jima
Bump for later read
44 posted on 03/07/2003 8:39:22 AM PST by Hacksaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson