Same question over here. Which law are we violating? Which treaty? The article gives no hint about this and I'll bet the Vatican can't make a legal case. Why is the Vatican so intent on embarassing itself these days? Doesn't it have enough on its plate without embroiling itself in electoral politics over here?
I don't see it. Let the Pope pray for peace. Let U.S. action bring it about.
***The Holy See is urging those in positions of civil authority to take fully into account all aspects of this crisis. In that regard, the Holy See's position has been two-fold. First, the Iraqi government is obliged to fulfill completely and fully its international obligations regarding human rights and disarmament under the UN resolutions with respect for international norms. Second, these obligations and their fulfillment must continue to be pursued within the framework of the United Nations.
The Holy See maintains that there are still peaceful avenues within the context of the vast patrimony of international law and institutions which exist for that purpose. A decision regarding the use of military force can only be taken within the framework of the United Nations, but always taking into account the grave consequences of such an armed conflict: the suffering of the people of Iraq and those involved in the military operation, a further instability in the region and a new gulf between Islam and Christianity. ***
Treaties are "laws" only to the extent that they are scrupulously observed by all parties; otherwise they are more useful in the breach than in the application.
That aside, I have yet to see a recent cogent explanation by anyone of exactly what the mythical term "International Law" means. It is used by the brainless constantly... and even they haven't a clue about what it means, or if it even exists.
But it sounds "good" and gives the useful idiots a false feeling of apparent authority.
Maybe the Vatican wants to keep up with the National Council of Churches.