Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cicero
From what I have read, the word "brother" in Aramaic (sp?) is meant to mean "cousin" as well.

It has been proposed that Joseph, being much older than Mary, had children from a previous marriage. Thus, Jesus having a "brother" (half-brother) is not far fetched.
5 posted on 03/05/2003 7:44:48 PM PST by annyokie (I love my MBA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: annyokie
The New Testament is quite clear that after the birth of Christ, Joseph and Mary had other children.

No need for historical contortions about it.
6 posted on 03/05/2003 7:52:06 PM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: annyokie
Jesus did have a half-brother. His name was James.
8 posted on 03/05/2003 8:08:13 PM PST by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: annyokie
There are two issues. As you say, the word translated as "brethren" or "brothers" can mean simply cousins or blood relatives.

The other issue is that although part of the inscription seems genuine, there are problems with the "brother of Jesus" part. It seems to have been added at a different date by another hand. And another expert has said that there are inconsistencies in the spelling.
14 posted on 03/05/2003 9:15:58 PM PST by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson