I like the idea of the Taliban and Iraqis being terrified.

Say good night, Saddam
Regards, Ivan
1 posted on
03/04/2003 3:54:42 AM PST by
MadIvan
To: Semper911; Bubbette; Kip Lange; dixiechick2000; UofORepublican; kayak; LET LOOSE THE DOGS OF WAR; ..
Bump!
2 posted on
03/04/2003 3:55:01 AM PST by
MadIvan
(Learn the power of the Dark Side, www.thedarkside.net)
To: MadIvan
B-52...The GMC truck of the Air Force.
It ain't pretty, nor fancy, it just get's the job done. And has stood the test of time.
To: MadIvan
Click on my name to go to military videos, including a B-52 video.
6 posted on
03/04/2003 4:05:37 AM PST by
Straight Vermonter
(I don't believe in hyphenating Americans)
To: MadIvan
"In the Gulf War in 1991, the tons of iron bombs dropped on the demoralised Iraqi troops in the southern desert did not prove too effective. Touring across those wastes after the ceasefire, the dunes and wadhis were littered with the carcasses of bombs - many yards wide of their targets. In Afghanistan the B-52s' satellite-guided bombs proved more accurate-and were decisive in breaking the Taliban lines."
This writer doesn't know what he's talking about. Having lead BDA (Bombing Damage Assessment) patrols after Arc Light missions, I can personally attest to the devestation that occurs when 3 B52 loads of iron bombs are put in a "box". It doesn't matter that many bombs are yards wide of their targets. The whole target area is so physically disrupted that drainage patterns are re-arranged. They are indeed very effective - just ask any VC/NVA who were on the receiving end of this treatment and who happened to survive, only to wander around totally dazed and combat ineffective sometimes days after the attack.
I would agree that guided munitions are more accurate/selective, but there is still a role for the Arc-Light type of mission.
10 posted on
03/04/2003 5:07:56 AM PST by
x1stcav
(HooAhh!!!)
To: MadIvan
I love the smell of napalm in the morning.....
11 posted on
03/04/2003 5:32:27 AM PST by
CatoRenasci
(Ceterum Censeo Mesopotamiam Esse Delendam)
To: MadIvan
Hey, Saddam! Meet my boy Lance.

To: MadIvan
"...90 per cent from the air, 10 per cent from the ground". This seems to be the rule of thumb for General Tommy Franks and his planners.Uh, we have 310,000 personnel in theatre or en route. That does not suggest 10% ground v. 90% air.
14 posted on
03/04/2003 7:15:04 AM PST by
Petronski
(I'm not always cranky.)
To: MadIvan
Re: your great photo and media "bias"
The antiAmerican Baltimore Sun today had on Page One above the fold, a picture of a B-52 arriving in the UK. The shot was from the ground showing two Brits looking up and holding their ears while the B-52 flew overhead.
To my jaundiced eye this was a view which showed sympathy for those on the ground and portrayed the plane as a menace.
Our antiAmerican media is so disgusting!!!
15 posted on
03/04/2003 7:20:58 AM PST by
maica
To: MadIvan
The arrival of ....Super Fortress bombers at RAF Fairford overnight gives a clear indication of the timing.... Timing? 1945? I think the last time a B-29 Super Fortress was in Europe was in the '50's. The B-52 StratoFortresses are a little more modern....somewhat. :^)
To: MadIvan
Saddam had better be wearing his Ultra Depends, 'cause he's going to need them--LOL!
They don't call B-52's BUFF's (BIG UGLY FAT F****RS) for nothing!!!
To: MadIvan

Let the nasties begin!
24 posted on
03/04/2003 7:01:52 PM PST by
lormand
To: MadIvan
good post
25 posted on
03/04/2003 7:12:56 PM PST by
The Wizard
(Demonrats are enemies of America)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson