Skip to comments.
Albright: Bush Should Hold Off on Iraq
AP via Yahoo! News ^
| 03/03/2003
Posted on 03/03/2003 2:03:27 PM PST by GeneD
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
1
posted on
03/03/2003 2:03:28 PM PST
by
GeneD
To: GeneD
Traitorous Dumbass ex-Clinton Blowhard Alert
To: GeneD
"We are actually accomplishing something," said Albright, secretary of state under President Clinton. Yeah, Halfbright, that's quite a revelation after your disasterous foreign policy, isn't it? And who is this "We" you are referring to, as YOU certainly had nothing to do with it.
To: GeneD
Albright: Bush Should Hold Off on Iraq
...long enough for the hot summer to make our attack cost more in american lives and time.
God I'm glad these idiots were thrown out of washington. Who the h311 cares what they think.
To: GeneD
Hey Madeleine, Room 622 needs their sheets changed.
5
posted on
03/03/2003 2:08:58 PM PST
by
dfwgator
To: GeneD
What foundation does she work for these days, the French-paid one, or the Saudi?
6
posted on
03/03/2003 2:09:25 PM PST
by
Shermy
To: GeneD
"We are actually accomplishing something," said Albright, secretary of state under President Clinton. "The president should take credit for the fact they are disarming." What's this WE stuff, Maddie? YOU and Slick spent eight years avoiding the problem - now let the adults deal with it.
7
posted on
03/03/2003 2:09:25 PM PST
by
dirtboy
(FreeRepublic - making liberals look like the idiots they truly are since 1997)
To: GeneD
You mean like we "held off" in Bosnia and Kosovo, Madam EX-Secretary?
8
posted on
03/03/2003 2:09:35 PM PST
by
TADSLOS
(Gunner, Target!)
To: GeneD
Madeleine Albright: A legend in her own mind...
To: GeneD
"We are actually accomplishing something," said Albright
Apparently, the cost several nations must burden in deploying hundreds of thousands of troops and assert the pressure to get rid of 10 missles is 'worth it'.
10
posted on
03/03/2003 2:13:24 PM PST
by
hippy hate me
(Peace had 18 chances)
To: GeneD
Someone needs to tell her to keep her fat mouth shut!!
11
posted on
03/03/2003 2:13:28 PM PST
by
cymeckajax3
(Sadam is going, going................................*)
To: epluribus_2
"Who the h311 cares what they think"
Regrettably, the media does, and all the sheeple who listen.
She's wrong, but Bush has waited TOOOOOO long.
12
posted on
03/03/2003 2:13:40 PM PST
by
InspiredPath1
(but, then again, what the hell do I know)
To: GeneD
Perhaps we should turn the whole affair over to Kofi Annon?
Would that do it? Notbright?
13
posted on
03/03/2003 2:14:21 PM PST
by
latrans
To: GeneD
Would
you take foreign policy advice from this woman?
Madeline Albright cuddles up to North Korea's Kim Jong Il
14
posted on
03/03/2003 2:14:32 PM PST
by
jpthomas
To: GeneD; rushfreedom
A LOOK BACK: U.S. warns Iraq clock is ticking: Albright rallies Persian Gulf states
"...On Iraq, Albright repeated her preference for a diplomatic solution but said time is running out. Interviewed on CNN's "Late Edition," she said it would probably be "weeks" before the United States launches military strikes against Iraq, but she warned any attacks would be "substantial."
Albright also asserted that the United States can take military action without a U.N. Security Council resolution. "We believe we have the authority for a strike,"! she told CNN from Jerusalem before flying to Kuwait. ..."
Albright Dismisses Critics Of Air Strikes On Iraq
WASHINGTON -- Secretary of State Madeleine Albright Wednesday scornfully dismissed countries like France and Russia that oppose military action against Iraq.
"The truth is they have no (other) answers as to how to make (the Iraqis) comply'' with U.N. Security Council disarmament demands, she told a Wednesday night news briefing.
"And the bottom line is that it would be very nice if those who do not support our approach had an approach that worked.''
The United States and Britain were alone when they began the raids on Iraq Wednesday in a "sustained'' effort to degrade its weapons of mass destruction.
That was a stark contrast to the 1991 Gulf War, when the two longtime allies headed a multinational coalition that forced President Saddam Hussein to reverse his occupation of Kuwait.
France, which fought alongside the United States and Britain in 1991 but is now one of Iraq's chief defenders, disassociated itself from the military action and said it could have grave consequences for the Iraqi people.
Russia, Baghdad's other key backer, planned to demand in the U.N. Security Council an immediate halt to air strikes.
15
posted on
03/03/2003 2:15:13 PM PST
by
Shermy
To: GeneD
Madeleine Albright ought to hold off her breathing for a while.
To: InspiredPath1
She's wrong, but Bush has waited TOOOOOO long.Yep. And he's paying for it. Not helping the economy either.
17
posted on
03/03/2003 2:16:12 PM PST
by
Shermy
To: GeneD
Halfbrite is one of the idiots that got us in to this mess in the first place.
18
posted on
03/03/2003 2:16:13 PM PST
by
Little Bill
(No Rats, A.N.S.W.E.R (WWP) is a commie front!!!!)
To: GeneD
New human sheild material ?-[ Madlame Alldull ]
19
posted on
03/03/2003 2:16:50 PM PST
by
BobbyDJ
(qsteps)
To: TADSLOS
You mean like we "held off" in Bosnia and Kosovo, Madam EX-Secretary? Madeleine "held off" in Rwanda, and the French-supported Hutus massacred 1 million Tutsis. Madeleine didn't even want the term "genocide" to be used because it would have required us to act.
20
posted on
03/03/2003 2:17:05 PM PST
by
dfwgator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson