Posted on 03/03/2003 7:20:57 AM PST by madprof98
Steele's decision breaks with Ehrlich stance, leaves rights advocates uneasy
Sending a signal he will not waver on his deeply held beliefs, Lt. Gov. Michael S. Steele will break from the new Republican administration's stance on abortion tonight by joining the annual Annapolis March for Life rally.
Steele's participation in the event is energizing members of Maryland's anti-abortion community, who say it is the first time in recent memory that a statewide elected official has actively embraced their cause.
"It is an encouragement to the pro-life folks to see a newly elected official standing up for life," said David Lam, executive director of Maryland Right to Life, a sponsor of tonight's event.
But with several abortion-related bills before the General Assembly this year, Steele is causing unease among abortion-rights supporters.
They fear that he could lobby Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. - who ran as an abortion-rights candidate - and other legislators on the issue.
"It's one thing to march; it's another thing to lobby," said Del. Samuel I. Rosenberg, a Baltimore Democrat and longtime abortion-rights supporter.
But even Steele's acknowledgement that he plans to discuss abortion with the governor concerns abortion-rights supporters.
"It is hard for us to know if Governor Ehrlich would be swayed by the lieutenant governor's extreme views," said Diana Onken, Maryland regional organizer for the National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League.
Steele, a devout Catholic who briefly studied to become a priest in the early 1980s, has such firm beliefs on abortion that he said in the campaign that he opposes it even in cases of rape or incest.
Over the weekend, he said abortion in cases of rape or incest should be looked at on a "case-by-case" basis. But he added that any exceptions are "a slippery slope if you believe in the sanctity of life."
While they agree on most issues, Steele's religious convictions also have prompted him to dissent with Ehrlich's pro-death penalty stance. In January, Steele - who opposes the death penalty - publicly called for a study on whether capital punishment is fairly applied.
(Excerpt) Read more at sunspot.net ...
Even in cases of rape and incest, the baby is innocent, didn't do anything, so why should the baby be the one that gets killed? Why not execute the rapist? How about executing the one who comitted incest?
Hey, here is a novel ideal, how about we do to the rapist what the pro-aborts want to do to the baby.
Good man Steele, hang in there!
That said, Mike Steele rocks!
foreverfree
foreverfree
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.