Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Japan fears N. Korea near point of no return
Christian Science Monitor ^

Posted on 03/02/2003 3:49:48 PM PST by RCW2001

The North appears ready to start up a reprocessing plant.

By Robert Marquand | Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor

TOKYO - Satellite photos indicating that North Korea is cranking up its nuclear program - turning on its Yongbyon reactor and testing equipment that reprocesses spent-fuel rods - are deepening worries in Japan that Kim Jong Il is approaching a point of no return in his self-styled standoff with the US.

Asian diplomats acknowledge the US wants North Korea to make the next diplomatic move. But Mr. Kim, they say, is using US preoccupation with Iraq to engage in activity that will later make it impossible for the White House to countenance any kind of talks. And, they say, neither Kim nor the White House realizes how far apart they are in trying to defuse the crisis.

The logic of these events, despite US assurances to the contrary, could force a decision to use hardline measures, even military means, against North Korea - if Kim stockpiles weapons-grade plutonium that he can sell, these sources say. That decision would hold risky consequences for northeast Asia.

Since last fall, when Kim began a rapid series of steps and threats, officials have focused on a central question: Is North Korea bluffing, or is it serious about making nuclear weapons?

South Korean officials say Kim is escalating to achieve talks with the US. But the Japanese have a different conclusion: that Kim is following a two-track policy that will allow him to play his hand to gain concessions or achieve weapons, depending on circumstances. "We feel at some point last fall, the North Korean leadership took the decision to make nuclear weapons," a senior Japanese official says.

A number of Japanese diplomats, alarmed at the North's increasing isolation, privately want the US to find means to talk with Pyongyang, though most admit they haven't found a suitable formula yet.

"There is a possibility of diplomacy now," says an Asian diplomat who has negotiated extensively with Pyongyang. "Time is a factor. We are worried the North will go over the edge. That won't be good for North Korea, for the US, for anyone. But if I had a formula, I wouldn't be sitting here."

A March 1 report in The New York Times quotes US officials saying that a small reprocessing plant near the main Yongbyon reactor appears ready to be opened. The report spells out a scenario where Kim could reprocess some 800-plus spent fuel rods that were formerly under UN inspection, and do so during the early stages of a US-led Iraq campaign, when it would be difficult to address. It is estimated Kim could reprocess fissile material the equivalent of one bomb per month.

Since last fall, the agreed-upon "red line" that North Korea supposedly could not cross continues to shift. Last fall, it was defined as Kim's kicking out UN inspectors; Kim booted them on New Year's Eve. The starting of the Yongbyon facility was another line; US intelligence reports that Kim started the reactor last week.

Reprocessing may be the next line. Or it may be pushed to an actual test of nuclear weapons - something Kim may not be able to achieve any time soon, if ever.

While China, Russia, and Asian neighbors say the US should hold bilateral talks with the North, it is uncertain whether there is much common ground even if the parties were to meet. "We would tell him, 'Stop making nuclear weapons.' We would say, 'if you want aid, money, food, energy, relations with Japan, then comply with your agreements,' " one State Department Korea specialist says. "But Kim already knows that. Frankly, we are starting to think Kim doesn't really want talks."

The US wants multilateral talks with North Korea, with China, Russia, and neighboring states playing a role. Yet a Japanese diplomat with extensive North Korean experience says this will be difficult to bring off. Kim will not go into multilateral talks, he says. North Koreans traditionally resist pressure, and Kim could not stand the loss of face that would result by meeting in a forum where all parties were push him into a corner to change.

"That's Kim Jong Il's worst nightmare - to enter a format where he is ganged up on," says a Japanese diplomat who visited Pyongyang with Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi last fall. "They can't take collective criticism.."

The Japanese feel that of all the Asian states, theirs is the one most likely to be attacked by Kim, should it come to that. Japan occupied Korea for 35 years, and Kim's father formed his core beliefs as an "anti-Japanese guerrilla fighter."

Dealing with Korea has been a bumpy road for the US-Japan-South Korean alliance since President Bush took office. Japan is the key US ally in Asia, and Japanese leaders affirm solid ties. Yet in 2001, when the new Bush team signaled a shift on the policy of engaging the North through dialogue, the news seemed lacking in consultation and dismissive. As months passed, a perceived lack of US policy spurred deepening questions, and in Seoul exacerbated old feelings that Korea has always been an afterthought for the US.

So slowly did US policy develop that last September, when Mr. Koizumi took a first-ever trip to Pyongyang to begin normalization talks, the move looked rather like an end run on a foot-dragging US ally.

Last October brought the first trip to Pyongyang by a Bush official, Assistant Secretary of State James Kelly. The trip was designed as a "test," says one White House source. North Korea's new engagement with Japan, and a series of announcements on economic reform and outside ties by Pyongyang, was an "opening to test how serious Kim is about joining the world."

The test involved Mr. Kelly confronting North officials with evidence it was building a secret uranium-enrichment program. The North denied, then admitted to the program - and promptly said it was nullifying the 1994 agreement that shut down Kim's plutonium reactor.

The current dilemma is causing some US Asia specialists to venture that Kim is simply outsmarting the Americans. "The White House has tried to label this a non-crisis, and Kim has upped the ante each time," says one former Defense Department specialist. The State Department has so far seemingly played down Kim's behavior, and some sources speculate there may be intelligence showing that Kim does not have the capability to achieve his goal.

Much of the current narrative is based on US intelligence reports that are difficult to verify. They are being leaked by differing factions in the Pentagon and CIA, whose aims are unclear. As Secretary of State Colin Powell flew through Asia last week, he said Yongbyon had not been started. By the time he returned, reports said it had.

Little is known about whether the leaks are designed to increase US diplomatic activity, to spur Asian states to do more, or as a rationale for planning a military solution if one is chosen.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 03/02/2003 3:49:48 PM PST by RCW2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Long ago, the US tried to "talk" to Japan about leaving China and Korea. As I recall that was a failure.
2 posted on 03/02/2003 3:52:28 PM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
I thought this had been referred to the UN to be handled quickly.

I am shocked that the UB hasn't resolved this yet-- with their stellar track record.

This is not just the US vs. NPRK yet, world. We'll get to this nutcase soon enough, though, if the rest of you are plum out of ideas.
3 posted on 03/02/2003 3:56:29 PM PST by RobFromGa (Real Americans Support Our Soldiers 100%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa
UB = UN
4 posted on 03/02/2003 3:56:57 PM PST by RobFromGa (Real Americans Support Our Soldiers 100%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
I have to keep asking myself: what are the regional states doing about this? China is probably inciting North Korea, Japan is doing a whole lot of nothing apparently, and South Korea is appeasing.

People don't like how America is "the only superpower", yet whenever there's trouble who do they come crying to?

I just hope that the Bush Administration has written a private letter to Kim Jong Mentally Il that if he sets one foot over his borders he'll be annihilated, and no bones about it.

5 posted on 03/02/2003 4:04:26 PM PST by Batrachian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
What's the problem? Jimmy Peanut Head gave us "Peace in our Time".
6 posted on 03/02/2003 4:09:40 PM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited
No, No, that was "Peanuts in our time".
7 posted on 03/02/2003 4:12:00 PM PST by tet68 (Jeremiah 51:24 ..."..Before your eyes I will repay Babylon for all the wrong they have done in Zion")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
". . . and some sources speculate there may be intelligence showing that Kim does not have the capability to achieve his goal."

I, for one, refuse to speculate that US satellites are vectoring semi-diffuse multisourced microwave energy beams into the Yongbyon facility, wreaking havoc with their electronics. No way. China might find out.

I don't know who started that absurd rumor.
8 posted on 03/02/2003 4:41:44 PM PST by Unknowing (Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
And, they say, neither Kim nor the White House realizes how far apart they are in trying to defuse the crisis.

Not so. In the words of that age old political insider Darth Vader, "Escape is not his plan. I must face him, alone.". Bush knows very well where this is leading, as does Kim Jong Il. They're both playing chicken. One of them may be bluffing. One of them is not.

The US wants multilateral talks with North Korea, with China, Russia, and neighboring states playing a role. Yet a Japanese diplomat with extensive North Korean experience says this will be difficult to bring off. Kim will not go into multilateral talks, he says. North Koreans traditionally resist pressure, and Kim could not stand the loss of face that would result by meeting in a forum where all parties were push him into a corner to change.

All this means is that they are a snap to manipulate. All Bush has to do is to stand fast, give nothing of real value, and patiently wait for them to be reasonable. If they'd rather die than be reasonable, then we wait them out. They will die soon without our help.

We're the ones with the advantage, not them. As long as we refuse to be sucked into their game, they are done for.

9 posted on 03/02/2003 5:33:57 PM PST by Steel Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
...We feel at some point last fall, the North Korean leadership took the decision to make nuclear weapons," a senior Japanese official says...

Feel - right! No doubt the Japanese read Kim's email before he does.

10 posted on 03/02/2003 7:19:38 PM PST by relee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson