Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: elfman2 on another computer
You were implying that because the judges exercised their "Free Will" as human beings in choosing not to decide, they've somehow made a legal ruling. That is what I was taking issue with.
108 posted on 03/01/2003 9:03:47 PM PST by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]


To: inquest
"You were implying that because the judges exercised their "Free Will" as human beings in choosing not to decide, they've somehow made a legal ruling. That is what I was taking issue with. "

The effects the same. If Congress makes a borderline unconstitutional law tomorrow, I think it’s as good as legal until a judge exercises his ‘Free Will’ and puts a stay on its implementation. They know this, and that’s what I think the lyric is referring to. No choice is a choice because it has a resulting outcome. (Who’d have guessed that a Rush lyric would settle this disagreement.)

111 posted on 03/01/2003 9:12:44 PM PST by elfman2 on another computer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson