To: elfman2 on another computer
You were implying that because the judges exercised their "Free Will" as human beings in choosing not to decide, they've somehow made a legal ruling. That is what I was taking issue with.
108 posted on
03/01/2003 9:03:47 PM PST by
inquest
To: inquest
"You were implying that because the judges exercised their "Free Will" as human beings in choosing not to decide, they've somehow made a legal ruling. That is what I was taking issue with. " The effects the same. If Congress makes a borderline unconstitutional law tomorrow, I think its as good as legal until a judge exercises his Free Will and puts a stay on its implementation. They know this, and thats what I think the lyric is referring to. No choice is a choice because it has a resulting outcome. (Whod have guessed that a Rush lyric would settle this disagreement.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson