Posted on 02/28/2003 6:41:23 PM PST by blam
Blix damns Iraq: too little, too late
Interim report to criticise Saddam's delays in disarming
By Andrew Buncombe, Paul Waugh and Kim Sengupta
28 February 2003
Saddam Hussein's prospects of staving off a war that will crush his regime all but evaporated last night when UN weapons inspectors said repeated demands for Iraq to disarm had shown only "very limited" results.
While the UN Security Council met in a private session to discuss the Anglo-American draft resolution that would pave the way for military action, a copy of the latest report by the chief weapons inspector, obtained by the BBC, said Iraq could have done much more. Hans Blix also said it was "hard to understand" why measures now being taken by Iraq "could not have been initiated sooner". The leaked report will provide comfort to Tony Blair, who was warned by cabinet ministers yesterday that the rebellion by 121 Labour MPs on Wednesday night had made "essential" the securing of a second UN resolution.
British officials at the UN headquarters in New York said that, while those members of the council opposed to military action would "find something" of comfort in the report, they predicted it would help the Bush camp to achieve the nine votes it requires to pass the second resolution.
However in Beijing today, Russia's Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov said his country was ready to veto the US-British resolution if such a step is necessary to preserve "international stability," said today.
"Russia has the right to a veto in the UN Security Council and will use it if it is necessary in the interests of international stability," he said at a news conference.
As diplomats continued to talk behind closed doors, there were signs in Iraq that President Saddam was already aware there was little he could do to avoid a military strike against his country. American military officials said they had detected movements of elite troops into new defensive positions. In recent days, trucks had been seen transferring members of a Republican Guard division from a base near the city of Mosul to the President's hometown of Tikrit.
But even as the countdown to war continued, President Saddam was still attempting to persuade UN inspectors that his co-operation was genuine. In a letter to Mr Blix, Iraq agreed "in principle" to destroy its al-Samoud 2 missiles, two days before a UN deadline.
Earmarked for destruction are all al=Samoud 2 missiles and warheads, SA-2 missile engines configured for them, machinery to produce missile motors, fuel, launchers, testing equipment, components, and all software and documentation about the al-Samoud programme.
Iraq asked Mr Blix to dispatch a technical team to discuss the "framework and timetable" for carrying out the order. The letter was delivered three days after Saddam indicated in an interview with CBS anchor Dan Rather that he would not destroy the missiles.
Mr Blix said earlier this week that the missile issue would be a key test of Iraq's cooperation with a UN order to disarm.
He has dispatched his deputy, Demetrius Perricos, to the Iraqi capital to discuss "the pace of the destruction" of the missiles. To some members of the Security Council, the issue of the al-Samoud 2 missiles – which have a range that exceeds limits set by the UN – has become something of a litmus test of Iraq's will to comply. President Bush has claimed they represent only the "tip of the iceberg" of Iraq's illegal weapons.
In New York, America and Britain continued to try to build support for a second resolution, focusing their arm-twisting efforts on the six council members – Angola, Cameroon, Chile, Guinea, Pakistan and Mexico – which are, as yet, undecided.
To date, Britain and America can be sure of the support of only Spain and Bulgaria with Syria, Germany and France expressing their opposition to the resolution. China and Russia, while not supportive, are unlikely to use their vetoes.
Downing Street said a pledge on destruction of missiles still fell far short of Iraq's obligations to disarm. Mr Blair's spokesman said: "We always thought this was likely to be part of the drip feed of concessions. This is how he [Saddam] plays the concession game. It is not the full, immediate co-operation that resolution 1441 demands."
In New York, a UN official said some of the council member states were "sitting on fences, asking lots of questions".
The report by Mr Blix is due to be passed to the council's members today. He will not meet the 15 countries face to face until later next week.
Mr Blair flew to Madrid last night for talks with Jose Maria Aznar, Spain's Prime Minister. Earlier, Robin Cook, the Leader of the Commons, and Clare Short, were among many ministers who made clear to the Prime Minister they shared many of the concerns of the rebellious backbenchers.
The ministers said they were "hurting" politically in their constituencies over public fears that Britain will back an American-led war without a new UN mandate. Downing Street insisted the Prime Minister would not be swayed from his policy on action in Iraq.
Watch where Saddam's "elite troops" go and you will find Saddam.
They have been in violation for twelve years. Enough is enough!
This time he really means it!
Greta keeps talking as if she believes we will get word any hour that they have begun destroying them. Late breaking developments after the commercial.
Nonsense. This has never been about war against Iraq. It's about freeing Iraq from a tyrannical dictator. Saddam could always take his cohorts and go into exile. Even now, at the 11th hour, he has that choice.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.