I think the point here is that the article's title, which is somewhat inflammatory to begin with, doesn't match the content. The poster knew that when he posted the article.
He edited the title, but not in a way that would clarify that the title doesn't match the contents or make it any less inflammatory. Doesn't that make you curious?
Considering the posting history leads some to believe that the article was purposely posted either to deceive, or to bait people.
I'm tending toward thinking that the purpose is to encourage division at FR, but that's just my opinion.