Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Energy firm goes after state; Allegheny files $5 billion claim over electricity deals
Sacramento BEE ^ | February 27, 2003 | Dale Kasler

Posted on 02/27/2003 11:56:17 PM PST by Robert357

Edited on 04/12/2004 5:48:24 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

An electricity supplier has filed a $5 billion claim against California, saying the state's efforts to break the company's power contracts harmed its finances and hurt its stock price.

The claim represents an escalation of a feud between the state and Allegheny Energy Inc., a troubled power conglomerate based in Maryland. The state sued Allegheny over the power contracts in January.


(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: californiabudget; calpowercrisis; energycompany; government
The company's claim against California was made by its Allegheny Energy Supply Co. subsidiary. It was filed with the California Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board

This could make for some interesting footnotes in the billions of dollars of debt official statements that California will be floating soon.

1 posted on 02/27/2003 11:56:17 PM PST by Robert357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Robert357; snopercod; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Dog Gone; NormsRevenge; Gophack
I didn't see anyone else post this and decided that a $5 Billion claim against the State of California was a significant story worthy of breaking news status and posting.

While I think this is a long shot for Allegheny, it could be reasonable enough to force the state into a settlement just to get it off of its official statements in bond issues.

2 posted on 02/27/2003 11:59:09 PM PST by Robert357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert357
They should move to file liens on the Capital Building in Sacramento, all personal holdings (cars, property) of state employees and all state park lands.

If they don't the state will stiff them and fall behind the state legal system.

This could get really interesting.

3 posted on 02/28/2003 12:03:46 AM PST by Centurion2000 (Take charge of your destiny, or someone else will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert357
Thanks for posting this. I tried yesterday, but gave up.

I wish Allegheny luck, but as usual, they are a David up against Goliath. California has all the time and money in the world to fight this case, and Allegheny is on the verge of bankruptcy (Thanks to Davis and Friends).

4 posted on 02/28/2003 4:27:52 AM PST by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Robert357; *calpowercrisis; randita; SierraWasp; Carry_Okie; okie01; socal_parrot; snopercod; ...
Thanks for the ping!

I have been away with Family medical problems.(my wife Kathy this time )

Calpowercrisis:

To find all articles tagged or indexed using Calpowercrisis, click below:
  click here >>> Calpowercrisis <<< click here  
(To view all FR Bump Lists, click here)



5 posted on 03/02/2003 12:12:11 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Recall Gray Davis and then start on the other Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Robert357
I'd think this would be a hard case for Allegheny to prove. Although the decline in Allegheny's stock value might have occurred concurrently with CA's effort to renege on the legal contracts, that alone wouldn't be proof that CA's underhanded tactics actually CAUSED Allegheny's problems.

This is probably a smokescreen by Allegheny to force CA to get off Allegheny's back and make a reasonable deal. It probably won't work.
6 posted on 03/02/2003 6:27:36 AM PST by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randita
This is probably a smokescreen by Allegheny to force CA to get off Allegheny's back and make a reasonable deal. It probably won't work.

In one sence, it won't work in that Allegheny has a low probability of getting any money out of a court decision. On the otherhand, I can defintely see an out of court settlement, especially once CA finds out what disclosure language starts to creap into their official statements and what that does to bond buyers.

7 posted on 03/02/2003 11:05:06 AM PST by Robert357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson