... which they started re-shelving again from their front-line troops because of the same jamming problem. The 'sand cuts' in the L1A1 SLR were an afterthought technique adopted from the IDF who found that it didn't do much to help the problem when the dust encountered was like talcum powder. The IDF had always had the gimmicky 'Sand Cuts', who chucked it for the Galil.
For a short time, the British front-line troops in the first Gulf War had even taken to using Greek-licensed copies of the Hk G-3 rifle, or borrowed M16/A1s fitted with A2 handguards from the USA and C7 rifles from Canada.
Also, the 7.62mm rounds they distrubuted with the re-issued L1A1s was delinked machinegun ammo from their L7A2s that's designed to fire inconsistently to create a 'beaten zone'.
The only reliable arm the British brought to the desert was the Sterling SMG.
My opinion is that the British should take the cue from the Australians and adopt the Steyr AUG if they want a real bullpup.
I tend to side with the individual soldiers, in this case the Brits. Most would eagerly trash the SA-80 for a FAL anyday. In early days of Afghan war, I noted Brit SAS carrying M-16s (full size) as well as the M-4 "shorty." Also saw a couple of FAL paras. Of course these elite forces have options. Little guy? Take what ya get and like it...Just hope it doesn't cost anyone his life.