[Bogey78O]

Acording to geektools it's not registered to Hannity and Colmes. It's registered to a muslim in Florida.

Nothing new. They just used a popular name to hoc their site hoping to catch people like this.

[Omedalus]

Aye, I checked and found the same thing. This is actually illegal; it counts as trademark/copyright violation. Not that Muslims respect our laws, of course. Nonetheless, Hannity and Colmes can demonstrate profit loss as a result of this infringement, and bleed this Muslim jerk dry in a punitive lawsuit.

[Fred Mertz]

Thanks for clarifying. Kinda like drudge.com or whitehouse.com (Used to be a porn site, easy to confuse with whitehouse.gov)

[PeoplesRep_of_LA]

Perhaps I'm just over simplifying here, but after reading the Chicago Muslim who "loves" America yet supports Sept 11 and future ones because the "cause" of the muslim colonist's drones popularly referred to as the Palistinian people, a fad Osama was late in jumping on, it makes me wonder if people shouldn't see this. It doesn't make me question anything about my Christianity, or question anything else, save for whether Islam generally is a religion of peace. That may be unfair since this is clearly by some terrorist sympathizers who will lie no matter what, but it makes you think.

Know thy enemy, I guess Christianity is a big threat to these relics from the 14th century!

[Bobby Chang]

Cybersquatting of a trademark.