Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GOPcapitalist
They also must not have thought much of it based on the fact that the tariff they enacted for the confederacy was not protectionist.

Until they began protecting sugar a year later. Then they started taxing exports. Then they started taxing production. They taxed damn near everything but slaves. I wonder why?

If protective tariffs were such a big cause, tell us why the North West states who were also opposed to protective tariffs didn't join with the secessionists?

291 posted on 03/04/2003 7:18:17 AM PST by Ditto (You are free to form your own opinions, but not your own facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies ]


To: Ditto
If protective tariffs were such a big cause, tell us why the North West states who were also opposed to protective tariffs didn't join with the secessionists?

Happily. The Morrill act gave them protection. And if they were so opposed to protectionism, why did practically every single one of them vote for the Morrill Act when it came before the House? Evidently they weren't as anti-protectionist as you claim.

294 posted on 03/04/2003 6:59:46 PM PST by GOPcapitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson