Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cacophonous
Also, I'm not sure I agree that secession is un-Constitutional.

But the president's use of force to ensure that United States law operate in all the states -is- constitutional.

Walt

24 posted on 02/26/2003 1:49:41 PM PST by WhiskeyPapa (Be copy now to men of grosser blood and teach them how to war!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: WhiskeyPapa
But the president's use of force to ensure that United States law operate in all the states -is- constitutional.

But only if the President himself acts within the framework of thr Constitution, which Lincoln did not.

29 posted on 02/26/2003 1:54:56 PM PST by Cacophonous (I Corinthians 16:13-14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: WhiskeyPapa
"But the president's use of force to ensure that United States law operate in all the states -is- constitutional."

Yes indeed, in all of the states in the Union.

48 posted on 02/26/2003 2:24:57 PM PST by Aurelius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: WhiskeyPapa
That authority is for states that are IN THE UNION....
South Carolina wasn't by that time!
91 posted on 02/27/2003 4:42:37 AM PST by TexConfederate1861
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson