Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RCW2001
The resounding major media is resounding, is it not?

This is a great ruling - notice that with the exception of Stevens, even the liberals and pro-abortion judges *still* ruled for the pro-lifers. Thank you, God.

20 posted on 02/26/2003 7:35:56 AM PST by valkyrieanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: valkyrieanne
Sorry - that should have read, "The major media *silence* is resounding, is it not?"
22 posted on 02/26/2003 7:36:24 AM PST by valkyrieanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: valkyrieanne
So Stevens was the "AWOL" liberal judge who didn't have the guts to vote.
61 posted on 02/26/2003 8:04:51 AM PST by Robert A Cook PE (ABCNNBCBS lie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: valkyrieanne
This is a great ruling - notice that with the exception of Stevens, even the liberals and pro-abortion judges *still* ruled for the pro-lifers. Thank you, God.

If they had ruled otherwise the ruling would have bit the Left right on the rear end. If RICO suits were permitted against people who do not have a direct financial stake in picketing outside a business, then PETA and all sorts of other leftie groups would have been just as vulnerable as right to life groups.

That fact probably explains why the liberal justices saw fit to rule based on the Constitution rather than ideology.

88 posted on 02/26/2003 8:27:43 AM PST by Numbers Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson