[Poohbah]

You are not allowed to prohibit people from expressing their opinion in a non-violent way on public property because you disagree with it, or because it threatens your business, etc.

Blocking access to or from public property is not nonviolent expression of opinion.

[Campion]

Blocking access to or from public property is not nonviolent expression of opinion.

Again, as I understand NOW's position, you didn't have to "block access". All you had to do was "impede" or "delay" one of their clients. Saying, "Miss, may I talk to you" constitutes "delaying" someone.

[Notwithstanding]

But is IS civil nonviolent disobedience.

[Notwithstanding]

But it IS civil nonviolent disobedience.