Posted on 02/25/2003 5:54:25 AM PST by Fred Mertz
Edited on 05/07/2004 6:46:49 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
A Jefferson County grand jury declined yesterday to indict two detectives in the fatal Dec. 5 shooting of an African-American man holding a box-cutter knife with his hands cuffed behind his back.
''Every person in Kentucky, whether a citizen or police officer, has the right of self-defense,'' Commonwealth's Attorney Dave Stengel said at a news conference last night, after the grand jury's decision in the slaying of James Edward Taylor was announced.
(Excerpt) Read more at courier-journal.com ...
The driver made the tv news as he had to be hospitalized.
Then the cop went to the hospital and beat him up again made tv news again, but with further investigation. Seems he had multiple rape charges against him that were never brought to court.
He went on admin leave until internal affairs took care of it...a paid vacation.
I really think they should face same consequences of their actions as you or I but they dont.
Heck, one of the worst drunk drivers I've ever been behind up here was in a sheriffs car with DUI patrol on the back of it. Myself and my carpooler were too chicken to try to flag him down and issue a citizen arrest. Good thing we didn't...
And if you look it up, you will see that the Reverend Louis Coleman doesn't even live in Louisville; he resides in Shelbyville, Kentucky.
Argument from hypothetical situations is pretty easy. Has this ever happened before? It seems to me that guy with a knife, even if he's handcuffed could be pretty dangerous. If I were on a jury I could see acquiting this hypothetical person.
What is the chance you are on the jury? When the DA is making political points prosecuting you as a racist and he offers you that murder 2 plea bargain it is the best you are going to get, unless you are a cop.
So you think that if you shot a handcuffed man armed with a box cutter 11 times the DA won't prosecute?
OK,tell me this, A buddy and you chase a 14 year old punk out of your house that he has broken into. While climbing a fence your bud falls and discharges his weapon. You then freak out and incorrectly conclude that he has been shot by the unarmed 14 year old who you proceed to plug in the back and kill. Do you think the DA is going to let you off?
OK how about this, you have an innocent 13 year old handcuffed face down on the floor at shotgun point. He has done nothing, mind you. You then shoot him in the back and claim it was an accident. Do you think the DA is going to let you off?
I will clue you in. You are going to jail and your family is going to be left destitute from the civil action that the DA is going to De-facto support by trying your case.
Here is what happens if you are a cop: You are cleared by the DA and returned to duty. Now I don't begrudge the police protection if the DA would protect law abiding citizens with the same zeal. You know what, he prosecutes them with the same zeal that he lets the cops go. That is not right.
Be angry at the DA then. You have a point, there's an attitude that cops have a right to weild deadly force but citizens don't. But I don't blame beat cops for this state of affairs.
Be angry at the DA then. You have a point, there's an attitude that cops have a right to weild deadly force but citizens don't. But I don't blame beat cops for this state of affairs.
The only cops I universally begrudge are the "TACT" squads and the lowlife squads who illegally search vehicles by the expressway. The reason I begrudge this line cop is that I would be in prison and my family left destitute in the same situation. Cops should not be above the law. As a matter of fact they should be held to a higher standard than private citizens. The opposite is true. Thay can get away with murder literally. Just ask the DA what he calls it when you do the same thing.
When the DA's get their heads out of their asses and treat law abiding citizens the same as cops, I will support REAL cops with a passion.
When you are facing murder charges for doing the same thing this cop did and the DA is repeatedly saying you shot a handcuffed man 11 times, tell me the same thing.
Maybe it's because
a) he had a knife in his hands
b) he was charging the officer
c) he had the officer cornered
d) there was at least one other guy there, who could have taken advantage of a distracted police officer
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.