Arab World in Disarray, Divided over Iraq
Excerpt (emphasis added):
Arab League diplomats say Libya and other North African states have questioned the wisdom of a rapid summit as well as Lebanon and Syria.The critics argue that an early meeting risks being hijacked by Arab allies of Britain and the United States to back rapid military action against Iraq.
Egypt has been the most vocal champion of an early gathering but its calls for an emergency summit later this month failed to achieve the necessary consensus at an extraordinary foreign ministers' meeting in Cairo on February 16.
That meeting was chaired by Lebanon and, to the fury of some pro-Western Arab states, issued a statement sharply critical of countries hosting U.S. forces as part of the U.S.-led military buildup in the region.
But the summit will be chaired by Bahrain, which had originally been scheduled to host the annual summit and, as the home base of the U.S. Fifth Fleet, is considered solidly pro-American.
My guess is that we have been putting big pressure on Egypt to make this happen. The smaller and more forward-looking gulf states that have committed themselves to alliance with America (Qatar, Bahrain, U.A.E., Kuwait) want some cover.
I suspect the plan was to press for a resolution denouncing Saddam as a war criminal and demanding that he step down. This could be sold as a "peaceful alternative" to war, but would also legitimize the now all but inevitable war for our Arab allies.
It looks like the bad guys may have outmanuevered us in this diplomatic skirmish.