[Torie]

I am not sure. Overturning a long standing Scotus decision as wrong should have some consensus behind it. Absent that, it might further poison the water, and would be a disaster politically to the Pubbies. It won't happen in any event. What is more realistic, and what I would favor, is cutting back the progency of Roe first, to let the states work out the law regarding second and third trimester abortions. As a pracical matter, few states are going to ban first trimester abortions in any event, particularly if most keep them legal. Banning morning after pills and the like is even more dead in the water.

[MHGinTN]

Norma McCorvey is trying to get back before the SCOTUS to inform the court of the false testimonies and false data presented during the Roe hearing. Is there a chance the court would reverse itself since their first decision was based on proven lies and proven falsified data? Is there a chance the court will even hear the matter?... If not, doesn't that say something damning about the SCOTUS that 42,000,000 planned deaths and three deacdes based on lies is of no concern to the court?