Then, I hope he says something. No one should have the impression that he or his administration is in any way shape or form involved with these people, as these articles want us to think. Even though GW's name isn't mentioned the implication is there.
I know. I've been battling the implication for days now since some here on FR seem to buy that message, though they turn around and deny that is what their game is.
I see no reason for some statement by the president when there is no "there there", but I know some want every allegation that is dredged up addressed and denied, even when the allegation is absurd on its face. As it is in this instance.
Perhaps more will be demanded of the WH and they'll say something further. Not necessary from my pov.