1 posted on
02/21/2003 10:50:06 AM PST by
mhking
To: mhking
We expect this kind of pro-Islamic bias from MSNBC, but shame on National Geographic. Shame.
To: mhking
CNN to MSNBC
From ultra left to ultra ultra left.
3 posted on
02/21/2003 10:56:05 AM PST by
Mr. Mojo
To: mhking
I was waiting for this snake to slither out of his hole in time for the war. I got through on a Donahue talk show once to ask Arnett a question. I simply asked him "IF YOU WERE COVERING A WAR AND HAD INFORMATION THAT COULD SAVE AMERICAN TROOPS, WOULD YOU REVEAL THE INFO TO THE US OR ALLOW THEM TO BE KILLED?" He refused to answer the question, copping out by saying he would never find himself in that situation. I suggest any and all Freepers who get a chance to ask him in public, keep asking him this question! Let's see your hand, Peter!
4 posted on
02/21/2003 10:57:04 AM PST by
GLDNGUN
To: mhking
The question is, can one employeed at CNN move to a channel with lower ratings? Answer- MSNBC. Way to go PETER!
To: mhking
If an impotent, bald-headed quasi-reporter falls in the middle of a forest does . . .
10 posted on
02/21/2003 11:15:23 AM PST by
geedee
To: mhking
He found out that MSNBC provides a better flack jacket than CNN.
11 posted on
02/21/2003 11:19:14 AM PST by
wheels
To: mhking
14 posted on
02/21/2003 11:52:12 AM PST by
Nick Danger
(Freeps Ahoy! Caribbean cruise May 31... from $610 http://www.freeper.org)
To: mhking
This move should solve the problems at MSNBC
15 posted on
02/21/2003 12:43:39 PM PST by
cpprfld
To: mhking
I thought maybe he would go back to Iraq and hide under the same desk he hid under last time. I'm sure he is for Saddam this time like he was twelve years ago.
19 posted on
02/21/2003 1:43:16 PM PST by
LaGrone
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson