To: gore3000
Well, that's a stumper, because I'm sure that whatever response I give, you'll say that it tends to disprove evolution.
But I'll toss this in and see where you take it.
The structure and function of the genetic "code", i.e. DNA and RNA.
16 posted on
02/20/2003 7:48:34 PM PST by
John Valentine
(We live in portentious times.)
To: John Valentine
Ask him to name ONE Biological find that disproves Evolution, JUST one, and make sure that he doesn't give you any of his ID Behe Crap either.
I asked him that question once and never got a response, I wonder why. HMMM, Maybe because G3K is CLUELESS, yeah, I think that clueless is the right word.
18 posted on
02/20/2003 8:18:40 PM PST by
Aric2000
(Are you on Grampa Dave's team? I am!! $5 a month is all it takes, come join!!!)
To: John Valentine
The structure and function of the genetic "code", i.e. DNA and RNA. Yes, that does tend to be problematic for naturalists because 1) there is no natural and intellectually respectable explanation for its existence, 2) there is no natural and intellctually respectable explanation for its origin, 3)it appears "full blown" in even one-celled organisms, and 4) it contains more information than is necessary for any one given living organism.
The evolutionist assumption that it came from a rock doesn't exactly account for existence.
28 posted on
02/21/2003 5:43:23 AM PST by
Dataman
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson