Skip to comments.
New Age For Mungo Man, New Human History
Science Daily ^
| FR Post 2-18-03
| Editorial Staff
Posted on 02/20/2003 3:51:29 PM PST by vannrox
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
To: f.Christian
Blabber -- loggorhea // bloviation is certainly very much in evidence but *intelligent discourse* -- Crypto=Christian=Islamo //fiction () absent??!!
21
posted on
02/20/2003 10:03:10 PM PST
by
John Valentine
(We live in portentious times.)
To: John Locke
Perhaps asses then, eh?
22
posted on
02/20/2003 10:04:25 PM PST
by
John Valentine
(We live in portentious times.)
To: John Valentine
The darwinian dichotomy (( darloserian )) . . .
evolution is a dead branch (( hairy wart )) of science - - -
going to the fire (( laser surgery )) // ash heap of history ! !
Evolution is even worse than that . . .
some kind of alien POISON vine choking science // society .. .. ..
pulling it down === aids virus // typhoid // mad witch === SPELL disease !
23
posted on
02/20/2003 10:23:18 PM PST
by
f.Christian
(( + God *IS* Truth - love * SCIENCE* // trust -- *logic* -- *SANITY* Awakening + ))
To: seams2me
He's 22,000 years younger than previously thought? Hang on, lemme grab my lipstick. He's DATING material. Since nobody seems to have said it yet..
Hon, he's CARBON DATING material.
24
posted on
02/21/2003 2:49:06 AM PST
by
Erasmus
To: Aric2000
"Creationism is never having to say you're sorry." Placemarker.
25
posted on
02/21/2003 3:58:01 AM PST
by
PatrickHenry
(Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas)
To: vannrox
In the summertime,
when the weather is high,
you can stretch right up,
and touch the sky,
in the summertime,
you got women,
you got women on your mind...
...Mungo Jerry (as I recall it)
26
posted on
02/21/2003 4:02:22 AM PST
by
error99
("I believe stupidity should hurt."...used by permission from null and void all copyrights apply...)
To: John Valentine
Creationism is a morally an intellectually bankrupt dead end that has to rely on distortion and outright lies to make its feeble points. You really ought to do a little homework before you make such statements. Feel free to take your foot out.
What is creationism? Where are it's researchers? Where are it's facts? Where are it's results?
Such questions indicate either a gross ignorance of the subject or a blinding bias against it.
27
posted on
02/21/2003 5:37:18 AM PST
by
Dataman
To: John Valentine
The structure and function of the genetic "code", i.e. DNA and RNA. Yes, that does tend to be problematic for naturalists because 1) there is no natural and intellectually respectable explanation for its existence, 2) there is no natural and intellctually respectable explanation for its origin, 3)it appears "full blown" in even one-celled organisms, and 4) it contains more information than is necessary for any one given living organism.
The evolutionist assumption that it came from a rock doesn't exactly account for existence.
28
posted on
02/21/2003 5:43:23 AM PST
by
Dataman
To: PatrickHenry
Mungo Man (who?) ping. I think he had a hit with "In the SUMmer TIME do-dah-dee-da-da-dee! You got women, you got women on your mind!"
To: John Valentine
Creationism is a morally an intellectually bankrupt dead end that has to rely on distortion and outright lies to make its feeble points. As proven here on these threads everyday.
30
posted on
02/21/2003 7:20:48 AM PST
by
balrog666
(When in doubt, tell the truth. - Mark Twain)
To: John Valentine
As a creation myth, you are welcome to it. But please don't insult us all by expecting us to take it seriously. As a Jewish, theistic evolutionist, I take the Torah very seriously, in the way it was intended to be taken: as a guide to how to live our lives, and as a record of my ancestors' search for, and encounter with, God. It was never intended to be a science book,and I don't take it as such. But on the really serious issues, I take it very seriously indeed.
To: John Valentine
Creation // reality is a myth to the mad === insane (( brainwashed // indoctrinated )) !
32
posted on
02/21/2003 12:32:38 PM PST
by
f.Christian
(( + God *IS* Truth - love * SCIENCE* // trust -- *logic* *SANITY* Awakening + ))
To: Erasmus
Well, I'm 41, so I'm "carbon dating material", too.
33
posted on
02/21/2003 1:22:17 PM PST
by
seams2me
("if they pass the reading test, it means they learned to read" GWB 1/8/03)
To: Erasmus
LOL!
Just updating the GGG information, not sending a general distribution. Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on, off, or alter the "Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list --
Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
The GGG Digest -- Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)
35
posted on
05/01/2005 9:17:49 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(FR profiled updated Monday, April 11, 2005. Fewer graphics, faster loading.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson