Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal retirements fall short while hiring booms
Government Executive Magazine ^ | February 20, 2003 | Brian Friel (bfriel@govexec.com)

Posted on 02/20/2003 1:37:13 PM PST by Willie Green

For education and discussion only. Not for commercial use.

About 20 percent fewer federal employees retired in fiscal 2002 than government officials had predicted, the second year in a row that retirements have fallen short of projections.

Office of Personnel Management statistics show that 41,905 full-time permanent employees retired last year, a 2.7 percent retirement rate. Two years ago, OPM projected that 54,174 federal workers would retire in 2002. Actual retirements fell short by 23 percent.

The lower retirement figures suggest that an expected bulge in retirements that threatens to sweep away much of the government´s institutional knowledge in this decade has been defused—or at least delayed.

Retirements are down from the last half of the 1990s. An average of 48,600 federal workers retired each year from 1996 to 2000, compared with an average of 41,723 the past two years. In 2001, 41,543 workers retired, about 18 percent below projections. But a larger and larger percentage of workers each year is becoming eligible for retirement or closing in on eligibility. In 1996, 32.3 percent of federal workers had 20 or more years of service under their belts. Now the percentage is 38.5.

While retirements were down last year, the government hired more employees last year than it has in at least the past six years and perhaps more than a decade. Federal agencies hired 135,978 new full-time, permanent workers in 2002, up from 94,161 in 2001. The growth was fueled mostly by the Transportation Department and the Transportation Security Administration, which had hired 43,832 employees by the end of fiscal 2002. Most of these new employees are security screeners at the nation´s airports.

“The federal government is in the hiring business,” said Max Stier, president of the Partnership for Public Service, a Washington-based advocacy group. “The government has an enormous talent need that is going to exist for some years to come.”

Stier said that despite the lower-than-estimated retirements, federal executives and managers need to pay attention to the workforce. “If you have fewer people exercising their retirement right today, there will be more people in the future that have that right,” he said. “They are going to leave.”

Several factors could be contributing to the dip in retirements. One is the economy—with stock market and Thrift Savings Plan investments reeling and private sector job opportunities down, retirement-age workers may be sticking around until the economy bounces back. Another factor could be that people are living longer and therefore working longer before they retire. A General Accounting Office review in 2001 found that federal workers are waiting longer and longer to retire. Only 21 percent of workers who became eligible to retire in 1997 actually retired that year, compared with 40 percent in 1988.

Employees may also be holding onto their jobs with the hopes that their agencies will eventually offer buyouts of up to $25,000 to encourage them to leave the federal government. Congress recently gave agencies the authority to offer buyouts, though agency officials must justify buyout plans to OPM before offering retirement incentives to employees.

Stier said federal workers also have had a renewed sense of purpose since the Sept. 11 attacks and that the low retirement numbers show that federal workers are committed to their agencies´ missions. “Most people who are in government today are here because they want to be here,” Stier said.

Other end-of-year statistics include:



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: bloatedgovernment

1 posted on 02/20/2003 1:37:14 PM PST by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: Willie Green
Federal agencies hired 135,978 new full-time, permanent workers in 2002, up from 94,161 in 2001.

Ugh. Words cannot express my disgust.

3 posted on 02/20/2003 1:40:30 PM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion
There's a bulge alright....It's not in my wallet either.
4 posted on 02/20/2003 1:44:11 PM PST by blackdog ("But that's what I do" A quote from my Border Collie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blackdog
There's a bulge alright....It's not in my wallet either.

Mostly it's the incompetents working the metal detectors. They're the reason I'll drive 8 hours for business when I used to fly there.

5 posted on 02/20/2003 1:46:05 PM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
You know, I remember all the BIG TYPE SCARE STORIES about how the govt was going to lose all their "good workers" and we had to step up with BIG RAISES so we could hire and keep the next generation of burro-crats.

Thievin' MF'in lying b@stards.

6 posted on 02/20/2003 4:38:36 PM PST by NativeNewYorker (Freepin' Jew Boy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
tax examiner (3,214)

nurse (2,158)

Good to see the government has its priorities straight

7 posted on 02/20/2003 4:50:38 PM PST by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson