Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Robert357
Hi. My definition of "breaking news" probably isn't as relevant as the Admin Moderator's definition, which is contained in this recent post asking people -- in these times of trouble -- to be selective on "breaking news" posts. The thread is here: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/842334/posts

I recommend you read the original post for another reason: it's just hilariously funny! Whichever admin wrote it has a very very good sense of humor. :) But to the extent there is a definition, it's contained in that thread.

Hope you have a good day. Don't mean no harm: it's just that it's not breaking news. It's certainly a useful post and I'm glad you took the time to share it.
5 posted on 02/19/2003 1:51:04 PM PST by FreeTheHostages (DC Chapter .. Patriots Rally for America IV .. on Saturday, March 1st)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: FreeTheHostages
No harm, no foul. I will now be more restrained in the future in the use of "Breaking News." This is the first time I saw it defined in any kind of way. I have used it in the past to define articles that didn't fit other categories, but were very current.

Thanks for the information

21 posted on 02/19/2003 3:37:04 PM PST by Robert357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson