OK, so even the CPUC is trying to avoid paying for the power bonds and Davis' mistakes during the Energy Crisis. I wonder if the rating agencies and bond holders know this?
Inquiring minds want to know!
1 posted on
02/19/2003 1:38:05 PM PST by
Robert357
To: Robert357; Ernest_at_the_Beach; snopercod; Dog Gone
Well, I guess that the price of electricity is getting so high in California that even the California Public Utility Commission building is trying to beat the high costs that have been embedded into the electric rates by the CPUC.
Hmmm, that is hypocracy isn't it? No, wait may be it is just a conflict of interest... No.... Oh, never mind.
2 posted on
02/19/2003 1:40:40 PM PST by
Robert357
To: Robert357; Admin Moderator
not breaking news
3 posted on
02/19/2003 1:42:55 PM PST by
FreeTheHostages
(DC Chapter .. Patriots Rally for America IV .. on Saturday, March 1st)
To: Robert357
When electric power is banned, only the State will have Power.
Build more nukes.
6 posted on
02/19/2003 1:53:07 PM PST by
Willie Green
(Go Pat Go!!!)
To: Robert357
Here is the jewel of Times Square at 4 Times Square -- The Conde Nast Building -- in New York. It was built in 1999 and is called the first green skyscraper. The building has special e-glass and a fuel cell generator for additional power.
8 posted on
02/19/2003 1:54:11 PM PST by
doug from upland
(May the Clintons be shackled in orange jumpsuits and share a 6 x 9 cell equipped with an RNC webcam.)
To: Robert357
Yeah. Wasn't there an article here about how the CA govt pukes wanted to charge people going off-grid an EXIT TAX?
To: Robert357
What is the future of this experiment if the CPUC will consider, next month, a penalty of $0.05/kwh for the power
NOT consumed from the grid by virtue of independent sources.
Yes the CPUC is apparently considering penalizing those consumers who elect to escape the government controlled grid by securing their own power through solar or distributed generation.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson