Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Canadian city anti-smoking) Ban burden shifts
London Free Press | Wednesday, February 19, 2003 | MARY-JANE EGAN

Posted on 02/19/2003 11:34:33 AM PST by jodorowsky

When London's new smoking bylaws kick in July 1, employers and owners and operators of public places will be responsible for enforcement.

By MARY-JANE EGAN, Free Press Reporter

The onus will be on owners and employers to prevent smoking in public places and workplaces when London's new smoke-free bylaws take effect July 1, the city's medical officer of health says. Under the current bylaw that prohibits smoking in restaurants but permits it in bars, owner-operators can be charged only if they fail to provide proper signs stating smoking is prohibited, Dr. Graham Pollett said.

If the signs are up and a restaurant patron is smoking, the patron is charged.

But when the smoking ban is extended July 1 to public places and workplaces, it will be the owner-operator of a public place and the employer who will face charges if the ban is violated. The smoker could also be charged, Pollett said. The maximum fine is $5,000.

Meanwhile, talk of bars launching a legal challenge against the smoking bylaws is just talk, said Earle Taylor of the London Licensed Restaurant Association. "Obviously, the first question is can one launch a legal challenge," Taylor said.

"I don't know how serious anybody is but as an organization, we're certainly not talking of proceeding in that area. It would be a costly enterprise and I'm not sure that's a possibility." Mark Dencev, owner of the Richmond Tavern who led a protest march to city hall Monday against the bylaws, said he's heard a challenge may be considered "but I'm not a party to anything official yet."

Still smarting from city council's refusal in a 12-7 vote Monday to permit designated smoking rooms, Dencev said he's warned his 12- member staff three will likely face layoffs when the bylaw takes effect. "The bylaw means the end of my business," Dencev said of the daytime crowd, primarily veterans and pensioners who frequent the hotel to smoke and drink. "The younger crowd at night who come in for the live music might adjust but the daytime crowd is my bread and butter," Dencev said.

But one bar that went smoke-free a year ago reports an upsurge in business.

Cathy Redmond, a server for more than three years at the Wave -- one of the pubs at the University of Western Ontario -- said the on-campus bar has been smoke-free for a year and business is better. She credits that primarily on better promotions, as opposed to being smoke-free.

Bar manager Dan Smith agrees.

And he looks forward to the July 1 smoking ban, because bars at Western will have a level playing field with other bars in the city.

". . . Now, people have a choice of going downtown or coming here," Smith said. "When other bars in the city go smoke-free, then I've got an opportunity to fairly compete."

Gary McRae, general manager of the Western Fair Association, said both his operations and the slot lounge support the non-smoking bylaw.

"The expansion of the slot lounge under construction now is being designed for non-smoking," McRae said.

"There's concern about the impact on business, but a smoking ban in public places is long overdue, so we've been planning for a non-smoking facility." As for enforcement, Pollett said retired police officers may be hired to assist.

Unlike the current bylaw that is enforced by public health inspectors, the new public places and workplaces bylaws can be enforced by a London police officer or anyone appointed as a municipal tobacco enforcement officer by the health unit or city council.

Pollett said other cities have used retired police officers with success.

He said bars and workplaces will be the focus of an education campaign involving mailings and visits. The London bylaws are based on an Ottawa model that Pollett said has been challenged in court, but to date has withstood challenges up to the Superior Court of Justice.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Canada; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: fascism; sieghealth; smoking
I have something Graham Pollett can smoke.

I definitely won't be patronizing London's so-called hospitality industry any more if they don't let me smoke... let them go out of business if they aren't willing to break this law.

1 posted on 02/19/2003 11:34:33 AM PST by jodorowsky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: freeforall
Graham Pollett can suck my cigar ping
2 posted on 02/19/2003 11:36:17 AM PST by jodorowsky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jodorowsky
Cigarettes are horse bleep and should be banned outright.
3 posted on 02/19/2003 11:52:25 AM PST by GoAhead-Make My Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GoAhead-Make My Day
Thanks for the input, Commie.
4 posted on 02/19/2003 12:28:10 PM PST by jodorowsky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jodorowsky
municipal tobacco enforcement officer

I am really looking forward to life in the future...The non-smokers do not see the demon that they have created in their own lives.Do they think these people will just stop.

5 posted on 02/19/2003 1:59:12 PM PST by ijcr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jodorowsky
I am sure that those who go to the places you go will be pleased with your absence. No one wants someone breathing smoke in their face when they go out to eat or drink. Congratulations to London for following many other Canadian and American cities to ban smoking.
6 posted on 02/20/2003 3:12:00 AM PST by archhee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: archhee
No one wants someone breathing smoke in their face when they go out to eat or drink

Screw 'em. It's up to the owner of the business, not busybody bigots chasing the popular delusion of the day.

This matter is not subject to legislation, among civilized men.

Property rights, respect for private property, and the prerogative of its owner, used to be a tenet of conservatives.

But who cares, bar owners are nobodies, nothing, mere individuals, compared to the Health of das Volk.

7 posted on 02/20/2003 11:40:45 AM PST by jodorowsky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jodorowsky
Ban smoking in private homes NOW! The lives of children are at stake! We just can't have freedom, it's just too dangerous.>sarcasm ping
8 posted on 03/08/2003 9:33:21 AM PST by freeforall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson