No doubt. But that is another issue. We were discussing the merts/economics of H2 as a transport fuel.
That (corporate welfare) is the only "merit." Conversion of fossil fuel to H2 costs energy. Conversion yields pollutants. Net result you have tripled or quadrupled your fossil fuel requirements to shift pollution from many small sources to fewer big ones. You have also added an enormous capital intensive infrastructure to provide H2. No way this is better than direct burning of fossil fuels.