Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

N. Korea Threatens to Abandon Armistice
Associated Press , Yahoo News ^ | February 18, 2003 | SANG-HUN CHOE,

Posted on 02/18/2003 4:59:44 AM PST by prairiebreeze

SEOUL, South Korea - In an apparent attempt to force direct dialogue with the United States, North Korea (news - web sites) threatened on Tuesday to abandon the armistice that ended the Korean War five decades ago, accusing Washington of planning an attack.

A spokesman of the North's Korean People's Army said "the situation on the Korean Peninsula is getting extremely tense" because of alleged U.S. plans to send in reinforcements and build a naval blockade to prepare for a pre-emptive attack. The nations are locked in a dispute over North Korea's nuclear program.

North Korea "will be left with no option but to take a decisive step to abandon its commitment to implement the Armistice Agreement ... and free itself from the binding force of all its provisions," said the unidentified spokesman, quoted by the North's state-run KCNA news agency.

Armed forces of the two Koreas were in the middle of their annual winter training. But South Korean and U.S. officials saw no immediate indication North Korea planned to launch a serious attack across the border.

State Department officials in Washington had no immediate reaction to the North's threat. A U.S. official, speaking on condition of anonymity, noted the Bush administration had said in the past it would not respond to threats or blackmail.

Even if Tuesday's announcement is largely symbolic, any change in the armistice — the only existing legal instrument keeping an uneasy peace on the peninsula — could greatly increase tensions and uncertainty.

The 1950-53 Korean War ended with an armistice, not a peace treaty, leaving the peninsula still technically at a state of war. The frontier is the world's most heavily armed with most of the nearly 2 million troops of both sides deployed near the border, including 37,000 Americans stationed in the South.

The threat was the latest North Korean move in an international dispute over its suspected nuclear weapons development.

Recent decisions by North Korea to restart its nuclear facilities and withdraw from the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty have been widely viewed as attempts to increase tension and pressure Washington into direct negotiations on a nonaggression pact. The impoverished North is also desperate for food and energy aid.

The North has long been undermining the armistice, calling it a "useless scrap of paper." It has refused to participate in armistice commission talks.

Also Tuesday, China received North Korea's foreign minister for a brief visit that Chinese officials said ended with both sides expressing hope that the nuclear standoff can be resolved peacefully.

Paek Nam Sun met with China's vice foreign minister, Wang Yi. Paek was passing through Beijing en route to a meeting of nonaligned nations in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, according to Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Zhang Qiyue.

"The two sides expressed wishes to solve this problem on the Korean Peninsula through dialogue," Zhang said.

Maj. Ha Ju-yeon, a spokesman at the South Korean Defense Ministry, said there were no unusual movements by North Korean troops on Tuesday along the 150-mile border.

The winter training for both Korean militaries began in December. But North Korea suffers acute fuel shortages, and its military's winter maneuverings have been less vigorous in recent years, Ha said.

"I think there is little or no risk of war on the Korean Peninsula," South Korean President Kim Dae-jung (news - web sites) was quoted as saying by his spokeswoman, Park Sun-sook.

Kim called for direct dialogue between the United States and North Korea, saying such talks were crucial to international efforts to bring a diplomatic end to the dispute.

The U.S. military announced on Monday that it would conduct two joint military exercises with South Korea (news - web sites) next month, although it said the annual maneuvers are not related to the nuclear dispute with North Korea.

North Korea has denounced past joint U.S.-South Korea maneuvers as preparations for an invasion.

The North Korean threat was issued Monday by the spokesman of the North Korean military's mission to Panmunjom, a truce village where the American-led U.N. Command and the North Korean military meet to oversee the armistice. KCNA did not release the statement until Tuesday morning.

The U.N. Command, which supervises the southern half of the Demilitarized Zone between the two Koreas, had no immediate comment on the North Korean statement.

The North Korean spokesman protested the brief interception of a North Korean cargo ship carrying Scud missiles to Yemen in December, and accused the United States of planning a naval blockade.

"If the U.S. side continues violating and misusing the armistice agreement as it pleases, there will be no need for the (North) to remain bound to the armistice agreement uncomfortably," the spokesman said.

Last week, the U.N. International Atomic Energy Agency referred the North Korean nuclear issue to the U.N. Security Council. The council could consider economic sanctions against North Korea. The North has said it would consider any sanctions to be a declaration of war.

The nuclear standoff began in October when U.S. officials said North Korea admitted having a covert nuclear program. Washington and its allies suspended fuel shipments, and the North retaliated by expelling U.N. monitors, taking steps to restart frozen nuclear facilities and withdrawing from the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abandon; armistice; northkorea
More diversion and coercion attempts from the fraternity of dictators and thugs.

Prairie

1 posted on 02/18/2003 4:59:45 AM PST by prairiebreeze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
Ummm, folks correct me if I'm wrong but according to International Law a state of conflict still exists. If the Armistice is abandoned then the state of conflict (war) is then active.

Under that concept, couldn't we simply go back to the UN resolution to kick N Korea's but?
2 posted on 02/18/2003 5:08:38 AM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol
I have been wondering exactly the same thing.

You notice that the announcement regarding the North Korean intention ot abandon the Armistice came from the North Korean Army. That is no mere coincidence. Armistices by their nature are not agreements between governments, they are agreements between opposing armies.

Specifically, in the case of the Korean armistice, the signatories were the United Nations Command representing the UN member states that had committed tropps to Korea under the UN resolutions of June 27 and July 7, 1950, and the military commands of the DPRK and the PRC.

North Korea has threatened to tear up the armistice on several occasions. This time it may just do it. What would be the effect? Certainly a rise in tension in Korea would be one result. It would also create a sort of legal limbo, because since the armistice, North Korea has become a mamber of the United Nations. If the armistice were to be repudiated, the UN would be in the position of having an obligation to defend one, and prosecute a war against another member state.

Perhaps this is not a particularly difficult point. I don't know. But, as far as I am aware there have been no resolutions passed by the Security Council revoking or amending the key 1950 resolutions mentioned above.

Interesting, yes?
3 posted on 02/18/2003 5:52:58 AM PST by John Valentine (We live in portentious times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson