Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: boris
The civil war was not about slavery. Lincoln justified it ex post facto on those grounds.

It was primarily about the right of secession.

Except they wanted to secede because of slavery. It seems that Bill Clinton didn't invent such parsing -- southern slave holders and their modern day supporters seem to be well versed in the technique as well.

"Oh, oh, we're just fighting for the right to secede."

"Why do you want to secede?"

"Oh, just because -- nothing to do with slavery, nope, no sir."

61 posted on 02/17/2003 7:11:01 PM PST by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: jlogajan
Why did South Carolina secede one month after Lincoln was elected? Lincoln did not make the Emancipation Proclamation til nearly two years later. So how could it have been all about slavery?
68 posted on 02/17/2003 7:24:07 PM PST by takenoprisoner (stand for freedom or get the helloutta the way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

To: jlogajan
"Oh, just because -- nothing to do with slavery, nope, no sir."

The south seceded because of the election of Lincoln, which, to the south, foretold how the issue of slavery was to be dealt with. So (in legal analogy) Lincoln's election was the proximate cause, not slavery, although slavery was an actual cause.

135 posted on 02/18/2003 6:20:37 AM PST by WL-law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson