Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jlogajan
Why were we supposed to sympathize with Elvie and her father? Because they appreciated Stars. Remember how her room was full of photos of various (often tragic) stars? But all the work that goes to put those women in the spotlight is done by people like the Michael Caine character, obviously seen as 'seedy' and low-caste. The mother is an unsympathetic character. Why? Because she's blowsy and crude, lower class. But was she really any worse a human being than self-absorbed Elvie? I didn't think so.

It was very manipulative, in my view. Elvie seemed like a selfish little twit to me, too busy being curled up in her room feeling morally superior to help around the house or pull her own weight in any way, expecting her mother to take care of her hand and foot... yeah, I hated the movie. This was my interpretation. If you didn't get that out of it, well, that's you. Me, that's what I got.

20 posted on 02/16/2003 9:00:55 PM PST by A_perfect_lady (Let them eat cake.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: A_perfect_lady
Why were we supposed to sympathize with Elvie and her father? Because they appreciated Stars.

Actually, that was their form of escapism as they both were non-assertive, Elvie to the point of being an anti-social recluse. As such it was merely benign, but also a bit pathetic.

Elvie was a head case throughout the movie. Only in the end does she take the first steps toward normal human interactions. I didn't see any deeper meanings in the theme other than a vehicle to showcase the star's singing talent amid some actors portraying uncaring or exploitive characters.

24 posted on 02/16/2003 9:55:38 PM PST by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson