Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Troops plan to storm Baghdad on first day of battle
The Sydney Morning Herald ^ | 2/14/03

Posted on 02/14/2003 2:24:53 PM PST by areafiftyone

In new United States war plans, thousands of helicopter-borne troops and paratroopers would be flown deep into Iraq to seize oilfields, dams and banned weapons, and advance as far as Baghdad on day one of fighting, according to Pentagon officials.

President George Bush met his top field commander, General Tommy Franks, on Thursday to review plans quite unlike those used in the last Gulf war. That began with weeks of aerial bombardment, but the US suspicion that Saddam Hussein will try to wreck his country rather than surrender dictates that ground troops would be involved in the fighting on the same day as the air force or even before.

"I think the targets will be aimed at decapitation," one US defence official said. "You want to take away all his capabilities to respond with any WMD [weapons of mass destruction]. You don't want him to blow his dams, set fire to oilfields, or fire Scud missiles at neighbouring countries. You also want to put him immediately in a box in Baghdad and Tikrit."

The US has more than 150,000 troops in the Gulf, including some special forces inside Iraq preparing airfields and communications. There will be six aircraft carriers and 500 US air force planes in the region by the end of this month. Starting this week, 3000 soldiers a day are being flown to the area on chartered civilian planes.

Yet, despite the urgency of US pressure on the United Nations Security Council to give immediate backing for military action, it could be up to a month before some of the units and equipment central to the new strategy arrive in the Gulf.

The 101st Airborne Division and a paratrooper brigade from the 82nd Airborne Division will secure oilfields or dams, but they were only just leaving their barracks on Thursday.

The 82nd Airborne is a light force and can fly its equipment into war, so it can be in position (probably in Turkey and Jordan) in a matter of days. However, the 18,000-strong 101st Airborne, the biggest air mobile force in the world on D-day, has sent its trademark helicopters by ship.

As Mr Bush gave departing troops and sailors a morale-boosting send-off, the Apache gunships, the Black Hawks and Chinook helicopters were still on the dockside, encased in plastic.

Navy officials said it would take three days to load the equipment on to ferries, which would take three weeks to reach Kuwait and 28 hours to unload. It would take another few days to ensure they were in good working order.

"The 101st are exactly what you want if you want to put a force deep inside Iraq, and hit all those targets," Daniel Goure, a Pentagon consultant, said. "It may be we're looking at the middle of March before we're ready."

However, mid-March would coincide with a full moon. US combat troops would prefer to launch their first attack on a dark night, which could necessitate a further delay. But Pentagon officials insist they are capable of launching an overwhelming attack at any time from now, arguing it is not essential that the 101st Airborne be used on the first day of the war.

Defence officials and most analysts said the US would prefer to start the war with the maximum possible force on the first day, to overwhelm the Saddam regime, rather than to try a "rolling start" to the conflict.

"We tried the incremental use of force in Kosovo, but we found it just stiffened Serb resistance," a US official said. "I don't think there's much talk of a rolling start any more, unless Saddam mounts pre-emptive action."

Many pieces have yet to fall into place in the US plans before that full-strength force of 200,000 troops - including more than 40,000 British troops - is ready


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: donttell; itstrueamoosetoldme; ixnayonthealkingtay; shhhhitsasecret
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

1 posted on 02/14/2003 2:24:53 PM PST by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
I don't know how credible this report is.
2 posted on 02/14/2003 2:25:50 PM PST by areafiftyone (The U.N. is now officially irrelevant! The building is for Sale!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Remember what the President said, "those who know aren't talking".
3 posted on 02/14/2003 2:26:07 PM PST by CyberAnt ( Yo! Syracuse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: CyberAnt; areafiftyone
True....but it is nonetheless excellent strategy, IMHO. In fact, it may be the only and best strategy given what we know about Saddam and his activities to date.
5 posted on 02/14/2003 2:29:01 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Dan Goure is a moron PMSNBC talking head. I can't stand him I think he comes cheap.
6 posted on 02/14/2003 2:29:14 PM PST by johnb838 (tick...tick...tick.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
I highly dought this report. The people in charge of this war in Washington don't seem the type to leak this sort of thing. They are way too smart for this, unless it was leaked on purpose.
7 posted on 02/14/2003 2:29:51 PM PST by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
You also want to put him immediately in a box in Baghdad and Tikrit

Gotta find him first....

8 posted on 02/14/2003 2:30:15 PM PST by RoughDobermann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Bravo Sierra
9 posted on 02/14/2003 2:30:19 PM PST by dmeara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
Rummy said it, not the Prez. But still its a valid point no matter who said it.
10 posted on 02/14/2003 2:30:37 PM PST by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
"Decapitation." I love the sound of the word...
11 posted on 02/14/2003 2:31:06 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Why not lob a few missles and let the surrendering process start.
12 posted on 02/14/2003 2:31:43 PM PST by DannyTN (Note left on my door by a pack of neighborhood dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
I agree. I think this is a little bit of something to make Saddam have to rethink yet again if he's got his forces in the right places. Keep him guessing.
13 posted on 02/14/2003 2:32:18 PM PST by txradioguy (HOOAH! Not just a word, A way of life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
It's the sort of report that would make sense to Saddam, so that's why it's getting aired. Fact is that an air campaign could start tonight. And with 150,000 military professionals already in the area - they could go at any time. You can bet that there are ops teams assigned to virtually every oil field in the country. Many may already be on-site. Sad Man tried setting up a large surface-to-surface missile battery near Basra which could fire a barrage at our troops and facilities in NW Q-8.

US jets destroyed the entire operation with smart bimbs the day they finished it. Source: Morton Kondracke on Fox News.

Michael

14 posted on 02/14/2003 2:33:34 PM PST by Wright is right!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
In new United States war plans, thousands of helicopter-borne troops and paratroopers would be flown deep into Iraq to seize oilfields, dams and banned weapons,

That I can see happening faster than most think. The rest I don't buy.

15 posted on 02/14/2003 2:34:21 PM PST by StriperSniper (Start heating the TAR, I'll go get the FEATHERS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
In new United States war plans, thousands of helicopter-borne troops and paratroopers would be flown deep into Iraq to seize oilfields, dams and banned weapons, and advance as far as Baghdad on day one of fighting, according to Pentagon officials.

The story does not agree with the title and I seriously doubt that we have a "NEW" plan.

16 posted on 02/14/2003 2:34:38 PM PST by Mike Darancette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: areafiftyone
A real disconnect between the headline and the article.

The game plan is not a mystery. It's sound and minimizes casualties but we aren't going into Bagdad.

Franks will wait for a political solution at a respectable distance from the city.

18 posted on 02/14/2003 2:36:37 PM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Sure: The Sydney Morning Herald scooped our war plans from the inside, and no domestic paper had such high sources. Next?
19 posted on 02/14/2003 2:36:44 PM PST by WaveThatFlag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette
That's why I said I didn't know if it was credible. It didn't sound right to me. But I think this is owned by the Guardian.
20 posted on 02/14/2003 2:37:33 PM PST by areafiftyone (The U.N. is now officially irrelevant! The building is for Sale!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson