Spoken like a true bootlicker. Does leather really taste that good?
This statement sounds like it could easily be construed as a terroristic threat under much of the recently passed legislation
You're demonstrating the problem with the police state. All I did was disagree with you, and now you essentially accuse me of being a "terrorist". Your mindset led millions of Germans and Russians to the slaughter.
I've determined from your posts, that you're nothing more than a statist, and I won't change your mind. Nor will you change mine. We'll have to simply agree to disagree.
I just observed that you implied that politicians, police, etc. who were your political opponents need to be afraind of you if they don't do what you want. Actually, your exact words were " As should those who pass or attempt to enforce laws infringing upon the Rights of Free men and women." in reference to facing penalties. I didn't accuse you of anything, I just gave a friendly warning that you may find yourself in violation of a number of anti-terrorist laws with statements like those and should clarify your position and consider your wording more carefully. I've seen a number of people end up in deep hot water because of careless wording of their sentiments. If you don't want the advice then don't take it. But expect no sympathy if it comes back at you unexpectedly.
BTW, I notice that you haven't stated that you were not intending actual violent threats to coerce politicians, law enforcement, and the civilian population into a course of action, and that is terrorism. Look it up in a Black's and remember that the definitions have expanded broadly under recent congressional legislation.
We'll have to simply agree to disagree.
Apparently, we don't 'agree to disagree', we agree to be on opposite sides. My side has the authority and power, yours does not. The side I'm on will win as surely as as the governments side won at Waco.