To: All
Just something to add to your discussion... photos like this wind up posted worldwide through pedophile newsgroups, I've seen it (lots of beach and pool pics of toddlers, too). That's already a reason to consider not allowing him to continue. But also consider this - what if this man posts the pictures in a hard-core pedo newsgroup used by several hundred other pedophiles daily....
......and includes the NAME OF THE SCHOOL.
80 posted on
02/13/2003 9:10:35 PM PST by
Tamzee
(There are 10 types of people... those who read binary, and those who don't.)
To: Tamsey
I've seen it>>
And what does this mean?
88 posted on
02/13/2003 9:20:47 PM PST by
Coleus
(RU 486 Kills Babies)
To: Tamsey
Just something to add to your discussion... photos like this wind up posted worldwide through pedophile newsgroups, I've seen it (lots of beach and pool pics of toddlers, too). That's already a reason to consider not allowing him to continue. But also consider this - what if this man posts the pictures in a hard-core pedo newsgroup used by several hundred other pedophiles daily.... ......and includes the NAME OF THE SCHOOL. So, are you suggesting that all photography be prohibited at sporting events where there are cheerleaders, or beaches, or anywhere someone may get their picture taken, just because a photo MAY be posted on a website? How else would you control or prevent photos from being posted.
Or is it just Dirty Old Men that you're worried about? I'll bet younger men post to some of those sites also.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson