Replies

"I really don't care."

Sure you do, Stuart, or you wouldn't have made a point about post #5 or stayed up with the replies.

See, the analysis isn't based on what you feel by a surface reading. It comes from what you know based on life experiences and a careful reading of the details. I listed 9 items off the cuff that pointed to the most likely, but unknown, factor. That is, this woman is most likely a Democrat. This is a news discussion forum and if this story grows legs, this thread will become archival evidence for the reservoir of extraordinary corruption we all know the Democratic party to be.

Yes, you're right on a couple of points as I already mentioned. In addition, you're right that bad people can be in any party. The same case could be made for the Nazi party, the Red Guards in China or any other organization for which one might wish to create a context for defense. Nonetheless, arguing the exception doesn't disprove a general rule.

In a court of law we are held to different and more exacting standards of proof. Thankfully, this ain't no court of law, but rather, it's a court of public opinion. For my money these days, I'll take that over the opinion of a lawyer any time.

A final proof occurs to me that I overlooked before. Given the odds I discussed above, what do you suppose the odds are when a compatriot in the form of school secretary Torres physically attacks the police in her defense?

I'd say the odds just doubled.