Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: meandog; FreedomPoster; AnAmericanMother; lugsoul
Most of the natives I have discussed this with, including myself, would have no problem going back to the pre-1956 flag.

The 1956-2001 flag was instituted soley for the reason of protest against segregation, so it does not belong.

The new flag is a hideous design, propagated through back room deals made possible by king roy Barnes. Therefore, it does not belong either.

8 posted on 02/12/2003 11:41:35 AM PST by Vigilantcitizen (We need to legislate legislators!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: viligantcitizen
I'm with you, and have promoted reverting to the pre-'56 flag for quite some time.

When it came out, the new flag won an award from some vexillogical (study of flags) society for "worst new flag of the year". Honestly.
19 posted on 02/12/2003 12:50:52 PM PST by FreedomPoster (This space intentionally blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson