[Phaedrus]

Nice work, Remedy. I see that all the Usual Suspects have rung one another up and will surely soon begin laughing and scratching. As they yabber, they bump, so all is not lost. It will be most interesting to see whether any of their comments at all relate to the content your post. The Evols are best at ridicule but will ignore substantive contrary evidence. But I'm sure you know this. Darwin ain't doin' so well these days and I'm wondering how long all these "everybody knows" hangers-on will keep darting to and fro on the deck of a sinking ship ... ;-}

Thanks for the ping.

[Dimensio]

Yep, the ignorant fools will ignore reality and insist that the Earth never orbited Saturn.

You are aware that Remedy, aka Ted Holden, holds this view?

[whattajoke]

It will be most interesting to see whether any of their comments at all relate to the content your post. The Evols are best at ridicule but will ignore substantive contrary evidence

Which is, admittedly, exactly what I did. I will also freely admit I didn't even read the original post. I will go on further to say I won't read the original (ridiculously long, poorly formatted) post. Why? Because, as I pointed out, once I saw the source I did what any critical thinker did and checked out the author. This is what critical minds do. It took me all of 8 seconds to notice the esteemed author received his "PhD" from a "university" that was shut down by the state of California for fraud. THE AUTHOR GOT A FAKE PHD FROM A FAKE INSTITUTION THAT WAS SHUT DOWN. That's enough for me. Doesn't that bother you at all? No matter how much you agreed with the article, I ask again, DOESN'T IT BOTHER YOU THAT THE "MORAL" CHRISTIAN CREATIONIST AUTHOR IS LYING, CHEATING, SCAMMING, AND CONNIVING?!

A deeper check into his credentials yields more murky mirth, but I won't bother you with it. It's obvious you don't care anyway.

[Dataman]

. It will be most interesting to see whether any of their comments at all relate to the content your post. The Evols are best at ridicule but will ignore substantive contrary evidence. But I'm sure you know this. Darwin ain't doin' so well these days and I'm wondering how long all these "everybody knows" hangers-on will keep darting to and fro on the deck of a sinking ship ... ;-}

Well, Mr. Phaedrus, you can't very well expect them to refute an argument they cannot first undderstand, can you? Lower your expectations! After all, they (and their brains) are only here by chance.