Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Pilots in Gulf Say Ready to Act Alone
abc ^ | 2/9/03

Posted on 02/09/2003 12:39:38 PM PST by knak

ABOARD U.S.S. ABRAHAM LINCOLN (Reuters) - As some of Washington's allies hesitate to send forces to join a war against Iraq, U.S. Navy pilots in the Gulf say their warplanes could overwhelm Iraq without help if necessary.

"It would be much more difficult (to fight a conflict without a coalition) than if we would fight it with a coalition. Could we do it without a coalition? Yes," Scott "Notso" Swift, deputy commander of the air wing on the aircraft carrier U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln, said on Sunday.

"Could we do it alone with Naval Forces? Yes, we could do it alone with the Air Force as well. But that is not the way we fight," he said. "I don't foresee that happening at all. The coalition is very strong."

Germany and France, backed by Russia, have said they want to beef up U.N. weapons inspections rather than rush to war but President Bush has repeatedly indicated that time is running out for Iraq.

The Lincoln has just arrived back in the Gulf to join the U.S.S. Constellation in support of Operation Southern Watch, patrolling a "no-fly" zone over southern Iraq.

The Lincoln's crew were heading home at the end of last year when they were ordered to turn around off the coast of Australia and return to the Gulf as part of a U.S. buildup for possible war on Iraq over its alleged weapons of mass destruction.

With more than 70 aircraft aboard and accompanied by a group of warships armed with cruise missiles, the Lincoln could play a key role in an air war.

"I wouldn't hazard a guess to say (how long the air war will be)," Swift said. "I think we have got overwhelming force. But with combat there is no way to make a prediction on that."

Swift said the United States now had a much larger Naval presence in the region than in the run-up to the 1991 Gulf War.

"There is a significant Navy presence here now. That's because you are never quite sure if we will be able to fly off land bases and of course the Navy doesn't have those kinds of restraints," he said. "The expectation is we will have three carriers in the Gulf and two in the Med."

The key development since the last Gulf War has been the improvement in precision weapons, Swift said.

"The United States and its coalition partners have made a lot of investments in precision weapons that allow us to be much more precise, hitting military targets and minimizing collateral damage and civilian losses," he said.

For now, the Lincoln is focused on Operation Southern Watch (OSW) which for more than a decade has given U.S. pilots experience of Iraqi terrain and chipped away at Iraq's military apparatus.

"What we have been doing in OSW is essentially training for whatever may come," Swift said.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ussconstellation; usslincoln

1 posted on 02/09/2003 12:39:38 PM PST by knak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: Calcetines
Iraqi A$$ whipping bump!
3 posted on 02/09/2003 12:51:15 PM PST by The Magical Mischief Tour (Tag line (optional, printed after your name on post):)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: knak
We've got the support of at least 27 nations, so it's a bit misleading when the article says that we may go in "alone". Great Britain has deployed 1/3 of it's air force and 40,000 troops to the Middle East.

What's their definition of going in alone, not getting the endorsement of a U.N. that is bought and paid for by al-Qaeda?

4 posted on 02/09/2003 12:51:25 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knak
"Notso" Swift - Bless you for your work and your wonderful name!
5 posted on 02/09/2003 1:02:16 PM PST by jigsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knak
STICK IT TO THE UN
6 posted on 02/09/2003 1:15:37 PM PST by Marines981 ("Rattle the big dogs cage and get your a** bit")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
We've got the support of at least 27 nations, so it's a bit misleading when the article says that we may go in "alone".

The lie that keeps getting repeated; "unilateral", "alone".

7 posted on 02/09/2003 4:39:34 PM PST by He Rides A White Horse (The UN is irrelevant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson