Why? He's got a right to an opinion too, doesn't he? And to the degree his opinion is well-reasoned and thoughtful, it may have more validity than many that are less cerebrally founded.
And the opinion is not the man. Defending the right to an opinion isn't the same as defending that opinion. This forum is not much good as an echo chamber.
Justin Raimondo brings a cogent, respectable argument in favor of his stance. A WRONG argument, to be sure, but one that bears scrutiny, if for no other reason than to overturn it with the same deliberation that went into its construction.