Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Notwithstanding
So I guess we just wipe out that facts that several of the respective states after the signing of the Constitution had established state churches? And that some of those states required taxes, as much as 5%, to be paid to maintain those churches as late as the 1820s. And the fact that several of the respective states still require state leaders to have a belief in God Almighty before being sworn in?

In Barron v. Baltimore (1833), the Supreme Court ruled that the Bill of Rights limits the federal government, not the states. Connecticut had an established church until 1818, and Massachusetts until 1833.

Is that the kind of religious morality that you're against legislating? Seems the Founders and the immediate generation following thought differently

95 posted on 02/07/2003 9:43:45 PM PST by billbears (Deo Vindice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: billbears
I am required to argue for this side as an academic exercise.

I am very familiar with (and glad you point out) that the Constitution actually prohibited ONLY federal state religion similar to a "Church of England".



115 posted on 02/08/2003 6:44:29 AM PST by Notwithstanding (Satan is real. So are his minions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson