Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mamzelle; dd5339
If NASA's claiming the USAF doesn't have hi-res cameras that's plain BS! They had the AF specifically take ground based photos of an EARLY shuttle launch that was thought to have tile damage. They rolled the shuttle over to present a good target to the camera and saw enough to allay their fears. And that was in the early 1980's.
69 posted on 02/07/2003 6:50:34 AM PST by Vic3O3 (-47 below keeps the riffraff out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: Vic3O3; Poohbah
If NASA's claiming the USAF doesn't have hi-res cameras that's plain BS! They had the AF specifically take ground based photos of an EARLY shuttle launch that was thought to have tile damage. They rolled the shuttle over to present a good target to the camera and saw enough to allay their fears. And that was in the early 1980's.

Poohbah had me convinced it would be nearly impossible to capture images with enough resolution to see the damage. I believed him.

74 posted on 02/07/2003 7:01:20 AM PST by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson