GOPCapitalist wasn't happy with the actual quote so he said paraphrasing: "substitute this word for that word and that word for this word" to better meet his agenda. That's falsification.
GOP used the word himself in descriptive discourse in a followup, and your irrational mind fixated on that, and substituted it for the actual quote. A perfect example of your irrational thought processes.
He flat out said to substitute different words for what was actually in the quote. That's falsification.
I only suggested drug use to be kind and offer a public excuse for your irrational behavior that would not entail some sort of insanity on your part.
You're a false accusor like most neo-Confederates are. You proved it with your drug charge against me and called me a Communist.
As to the Marx support, if you don't want people thinking you're a Marxist, don't engage in apologetics on Karl's behalf.
I repeatedly said that I don't read Marx. GOPCapitalist falsified Marx' quote. I pointed that out. Poiniting out a falsification doesn't mean that the pointer-outer supports the person that made the quote and this is further evidence that you neo-Confederates will accuse anyone of anything falsely.
A grain of salt is good to take with everything if you think about it. Unless you're on a salt-free diet that is. BTW, You're false accusations against me of racism and slavery loving is further evidence that neo-unionists are false accusers and will just make up crazy things to fit their agenda and therefore their excuses for Lincoln should be taken with a grain of salt - LOL.
You admitted that you think blacks should've stayed under slavery instead of the freedom they achieved with the 13th amendment. I accused you of nothing that you didn't admit to. I had you pegged from the beginning. But that's not difficult with you neo-Confederates.
No you didn't. You just asserted it to be so without ever once bothering to demonstrate it. I responded by noting that Marx used the terms "proletariat" and "working class" interchangably - a fact that you admittedly did not know since you have never read anything by Marx. For any reasonable person, that would have been enough to settle their confusion. But you are not reasonable, hence you continue spouting that same old line despite its lack of any merit whatsoever. Oh well, quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur.