Here's your original question:
Is a few more decades of slavery acceptable to you with a Southern win?
And here is my exact response:
"If it resulted in better race relations after emancipation than what was created by the Northern carpetbaggers during reconstruction."
That you would prefer what occurred, with it's disaster in race relations and the extreme bitterness that resulted, to a gradual emancipation over a few decades that would have avoided these things and put civil rights many decades ahead in the long run, is just further proof of your irrational thinking. BTW, more black women were raped by Union troops during and after the war than had ever been accosted by Southern whites before it. That is a simple fact of history, just like Lincoln's race prejudice.
Your source for this claim, please?
Of course I prefer freedom for blacks over slavery for them. That you think that blacks would've been better off as slaves rather than free proves that I was exactly right about you and you have no concept of what freedom is.
BTW, more black women were raped by Union troops during and after the war than had ever been accosted by Southern whites before it. That is a simple fact of history, just like Lincoln's race prejudice.
Bwahaha! Like you have the exact number of time over 400 years that the master and his family took advantage of their situation with their female slaves. What'd they do, report to their local county clerk every time this occured so that an exact record could be kept? You're nuts. Another crazy made-up story from a neo-Confederate, but that's nothing new, is it?