Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: vannrox
Just about every society has formed around waterways, and waterways flood on occasion. It doesn't mean there was a global flood. Indeed, there is absolutely no evidence for a global flood at any time, period.
31 posted on 02/06/2003 2:31:35 PM PST by Junior (Put tag line here =>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Junior
Just about every society has formed around waterways, and waterways flood on occasion. It doesn't mean there was a global flood. Indeed, there is absolutely no evidence for a global flood at any time, period.

I hope Noah never found out! Else he'd be pissed at wasting so much time building the Ark instead of just moving to higher ground.

33 posted on 02/06/2003 2:36:53 PM PST by Diverdogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: Junior
Junior,

I am not talking about geologic evidence. What I am referring to the the global myths concerning flooding. They are two different subjects.

However, if you want to debate the issues associated with geologic flooding. Let's just look at what happenned in the Middle east. (I know you want to think about the Bible and that refers...at first glance...to be about the Near east.)

Everyone knows that the Giza Plateau was under water 10,000 BP. Given the geologic processes, we can only deduce that the surrounding area was under water as well, afterall, the geologic process is of the same site. This is verified by the Sumerian culture. Look at the layers of mud at their own cities...

But I digress.

You are discussing GLOBAL issues. My friend, we know that the pole shifts. We also know that the magnetic field shifts along with the pole. We also know that the strong magnetic field of the sun, keeps the pole IN LINE with that of the rotational axis of the the SUN.

So, if the pole shifts, the earth crust shifts long side it so that the two poles (earth and sun) at at the point of minimum entropy...IE aligned.

The atmosphere being fluid, will change as well. But it will be an awful adjustment. So what wa one in the tropicsmoves to another location.

We know that in the last 75,000 years that we have had three major pole displacements. The greatist being on the order of 45 degrees.

Since the earth bulges at the equator then we can deduce that the difference from the angular displacement be such that were the change to at 90 the would would and could experience not just an entire change in the earth crustial shelf shape, but also in the height of the water. Currently, the difference is 12 miles.

The last crustrial displacement was within neolithic times...possibly within the recorded if not historical memory of our race. Perhaps that is what all this is about.

Honestly...can't ever happen...go and prove it...need more inspectors...etc...etc...You don't have to believe this. OK with me.

It's ok with me.
37 posted on 02/06/2003 3:07:58 PM PST by vannrox (The Preamble to the Bill of Rights - without it, our Bill of Rights is meaningless!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson