Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: philosofy123
I overheard a looney leftist at a nearby table at a restaurant yesterday. She said that if it wasn't for oil, we would be after dealing with Saddam.

There is truth to what she says. Without oil, Iraq would be Ethiopia. Iraq has money to fund Saddam's palaces and weapons projects because the nation has money. Without oil money, they would be another poor nation. Without the weapons, Saddam wouldn't pose a threat. So yes we must deal with Iraq because they have oil but we do not have to deal with Saddam beacause we "want to take" his oil. We did not take the Kuwaiti oil fields either.

56 posted on 02/06/2003 2:00:55 PM PST by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: weegee
Right on. My position is a tyrant dictator who has been defeeted, and who has billions of dollars at his disposal; has plenty of motives and the funds to harm us. He must be changed.
61 posted on 02/06/2003 5:17:05 PM PST by philosofy123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson