Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Hopefully President Bush will prove them wrong.

Regards, Ivan

1 posted on 02/05/2003 2:25:08 AM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: carl in alaska; Cautor; GOP_Lady; prairiebreeze; veronica; SunnyUsa; Delmarksman; Sparta; ...
Bump!
2 posted on 02/05/2003 2:25:33 AM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan
"I don't think you could build a new shuttle if you wanted to. All the production facilities were shut down and I'm not sure the tooling is still there," said John Logsdon at the Space Policy Institute of George Washington University.

Think about the overwhelming stupidity of this statement for a moment. He's essentially saying that the whole of human society could never build another Model T Ford because the original assembly line was eventually retrofitted to make something else.

By that logic, McDonald's would still be on its first restaurant.

3 posted on 02/05/2003 2:29:26 AM PST by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan
A re vamped/ new state of the art craft, that can autonimously go from runway to orbit and back is the best tribute : in my view.

The time for new technology and flexibility is here......I sit like alot of people, numbed by the loss.

God Speed to them , and to a new orbital vehicle.

4 posted on 02/05/2003 2:33:22 AM PST by Kakaze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan
The shuttle won't be replaced, but I believe something better will, instead, be initiated. The first priority in this effort, however, will be convincing the American people, and I think the President is equal to the task.
5 posted on 02/05/2003 2:36:05 AM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan
will not replace the lost space shuttle Columbia for around 10 years, sticking to a schedule that may force the agency to rely more on Russia to supply the International Space Station.

This snippet reveals the author as uninformed. The shuttle Columbia never visited the space station. Being the first shuttle constructed, it was too heavy to be boosted to the altitude of the ISS. It's loss has no effect on the space station program other than to call into question the safety and reliability of the Shuttles in general.

6 posted on 02/05/2003 4:41:34 AM PST by Procyon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan
The ten year set back began the day slick willie became President. The future of the space program begins NOW!
8 posted on 02/05/2003 5:21:39 AM PST by OldFriend (SUPPORT PRESIDENT BUSH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan
Afternoon, Ivan!

Serious new doubts emerged today over America's ability to make any significant contribution to the international space programme for almost a decade.

I vividly remember hearing this "ten year setback" line in the weeks after Challenger. I could see ten years before a new space plane flies, but otherwise this is bunk.

11 posted on 02/05/2003 6:11:39 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (The surly bonds of Earth have been slipped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan
I suspect he will. He has so far. The Columbia Disaster will be the catalyst for a rebirth of a rational space program. It has languished far too long.
12 posted on 02/05/2003 6:17:16 AM PST by Redleg Duke (Stir the pot...don't let anything settle to the bottom where the lawyers can feed off of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson