To: Turbodog
We agree to disagree. I prefer to spend our resources protecting this country directly, and not policing the world. I realize I'm in a distinct minority here, as well as with the population at large. For the record, I want to say I'm against this foreign intervention, as I've been against just about every foreign intervention we've ever been engaged in. But, although I shouldn't have to say this, let me also say for the record that I am in fact opposed to terrorism, third-world dictators (well, actually all dictators) and most of Islam dogma. I know we're going in, and I wish our troops well.
To: bigunreal
For the record, I want to say I'm against this foreign intervention, as I've been against just about every foreign intervention we've ever been engaged in.You must be your very own moral superpower. Like I said, go sell your car and start riding your bicycle since you feel you can exist very nicely without our foreign engagements, "entanglements" and interventions. This war is to make a more stable MiddleEast. One more to our liking, that will have oil flowing freely without the specter of Saddam Hussein and his weapons of mass destruction. Let me guess, you're a confused libertarian, right?
115 posted on
02/05/2003 3:17:48 AM PST by
dennisw
( http://www.littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/weblog.php)
To: bigunreal
So you favor...isolationism? I'm not saying it's a bad word. Although I'll have to agree to disagree as well. Isolationism in this day and age is impossible.
118 posted on
02/05/2003 6:10:31 AM PST by
Kip Lange
(The Khaki Pants of Freedom)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson